Burgess: Historic wreck may have been moved at Heritage Wharf

Make text smaller Make text larger

  • Shadow Public Works Minister Derrick Burgess

    Shadow Public Works Minister Derrick Burgess


A historic wreck may have been moved to allow work at Heritage Wharf, according to Shadow Public Works Minister Derrick Burgess.

Mr Burgess said yesterday: “It has come to my attention that a historic wreck has been removed from the ocean to facilitate the project.

“Hopefully Mr Moniz can confirm to us whether this is in fact true and if the removal was in accordance with the Historic Wrecks Act 2001.”

The question was one of several posed by the Shadow Minister yesterday regarding the West End project.

Heritage Wharf was completed in 2009 at a final cost of $60 million — 70 percent more than the original quote of $35 million.

The project sparked further controversy when it was revealed that upgrades necessary to service larger cruise ships like the Norwegian Breakaway — scheduled to visit the port next month — would cost another $22 million.

Mr Moniz has said it is still believed work will be completed by the May 15 deadline, but the Progressive Labour Party has continued to challenge how the project is being handled.

Mr Burgess yesterday listed a raft of concerns about the project, including the process of selecting companies involved in the project, the use of ungalvanised rebar and the lack of a cost breakdown.

He also said that while Mr Moniz has said 75 percent of the workers employed for the project would be Bermudian, the Minister had not stated how many Bermudians would be hired.

“I have noted that the Minister has stated that ‘Bermudian labour is present employed at both the Heritage Wharf site and the South Basin site’, but it is my information that there are only migrant workers on the Heritage Wharf site at present,” Mr Burgess said.

The Shadow Minister also claimed Public Works Minister Trevor Moniz has been “unprofessional” in response to the many queries that he has put forward.

“It is obvious that the Minister has forgotten the role of the Opposition, which is to hold the Government to account on behalf of the people of Bermuda,” Mr Burgess said.

A Ministry of Public Works spokesman have yet to respond to the questions posed by Mr Burgess, however the Ministry previously spoke on the issue of ungalvanised rebar on the project.

At that time, the Ministry said the practice is common in other jurisdictions as there are other means to prevent corrosion.

Based on the advice of a fully qualified corrosion specialist, the Ministry determined that using galvanised reinforcement would have “little or no benefit” in the Heritage Wharf project as the epoxy coating and concrete used would protect the steel among other measures.

A “cathodic protection system” could also be fitted at the site to protect both the new work and the existing dock structure.

You must be registered or signed-in to post comment or to vote.

Published Apr 17, 2013 at 8:00 am (Updated Apr 16, 2013 at 11:38 pm)

Burgess: Historic wreck may have been moved at Heritage Wharf

What you
Need to
Know
1. For a smooth experience with our commenting system we recommend that you use Internet Explorer 10 or higher, Firefox or Chrome Browsers. Additionally please clear both your browser's cache and cookies - How do I clear my cache and cookies?
2. Please respect the use of this community forum and its users.
3. Any poster that insults, threatens or verbally abuses another member, uses defamatory language, or deliberately disrupts discussions will be banned.
4. Users who violate the Terms of Service or any commenting rules will be banned.
5. Please stay on topic. "Trolling" to incite emotional responses and disrupt conversations will be deleted.
6. To understand further what is and isn't allowed and the actions we may take, please read our Terms of Service
7. To report breaches of the Terms of Service use the flag icon

Take Our Poll

  • Which of the following best describes your opinion on how Senior Civil Servant job positions should be granted?
  • Senior civil servants should be appointed on a temporary contract renewable basis.
  • 74%
  • Senior civil servants should continue to be appointed on a permanent basis
  • 18%
  • Don't Know
  • 8%
  • Total Votes: 2155
  • Poll Archive

Today's Obituaries

View all Obituaries Place an obituary

Facebook Activity