New abortion Bill is an assault on freedom to choose

Make text smaller Make text larger


The House of Representatives voted last week to ban abortions of foetuses that have passed 20 weeks of gestation, sending to the Senate a Bill purportedly about protecting foetuses capable of feeling pain.

Among the reasons for scepticism: the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists says that foetuses cannot feel pain at 20 weeks, and the Senate almost certainly will not pass the Bill.

The House would have better spent its legislative time if it had renamed a post office somewhere. No matter: Republicans need money and passion from anti-abortion groups, who insisted on moving the bill, and it passed by a 237-189 vote.

One of the Bill’s co-sponsors was Tim Murphy, the Pennsylvania representative, On the same day Murphy was voting for the Bill, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette published text messages that appear to show the congressman and a woman he had a relationship with discussing how he pressured her to get an abortion this year, when she had a pregnancy scare.

On a day when the Republican Party was forcing a gratuitous vote on abortion, could there be a more exquisite reminder that politicians’ embrace of divisive, cultural wedge issues is often less than principled?

Even if Murphy’s staunchly anti-abortion stance had been sincere before he had to make a decision that would affect his own life, his example underscores a truth about the abortion issue. It is far easier to judge people struggling with whether to terminate a pregnancy than it is to personally embrace the decision that anti-abortion activists would demand the Government force them to make. Many in the anti-abortion camp would struggle when confronted with the reality of an unwanted pregnancy. Some in this situation seek the aid of friends, family or religious counsellors. With more and more restrictions on legal abortion, others would seek the help of unregulated and unscrupulous illegal abortion operations or dangerous at-home remedies.

Of course, there are anti-abortion advocates who live their principles with more consistency than Murphy, who announced on Thursday that he was resigning from Congress.

People of goodwill disagree about when life begins and mourn what they see as the morally disturbing decisions others make. But in a free society, and in the absence of a clear scientific standard, such decisions should remain with the consciences of individuals, not a matter of federal fiat. The Constitution demands as much.

Mid and late-term abortions are already extremely rare, and a common motivation is concern that foetuses are developing with severe abnormalities. The House Bill would allow no exception for this circumstance. It would represent an unforgiving assault on the freedom to choose.

You must be registered or signed-in to post comment or to vote.

Published Oct 12, 2017 at 8:00 am (Updated Oct 12, 2017 at 12:53 am)

New abortion Bill is an assault on freedom to choose

What you
Need to
Know
1. For a smooth experience with our commenting system we recommend that you use Internet Explorer 10 or higher, Firefox or Chrome Browsers. Additionally please clear both your browser's cache and cookies - How do I clear my cache and cookies?
2. Please respect the use of this community forum and its users.
3. Any poster that insults, threatens or verbally abuses another member, uses defamatory language, or deliberately disrupts discussions will be banned.
4. Users who violate the Terms of Service or any commenting rules will be banned.
5. Please stay on topic. "Trolling" to incite emotional responses and disrupt conversations will be deleted.
6. To understand further what is and isn't allowed and the actions we may take, please read our Terms of Service
7. To report breaches of the Terms of Service use the flag icon

  • Take Our Poll

    Today's Obituaries