Logo Logo
Right to Know Campaign Bermuda, Tuesday, February 9, 2010 Contact us

Home
News
Business
Sport
Opinion
Lifestyle
Gazette Video
Death & Funeral Notices
Special Sections
Year in Review 2009
Xmas Short Stories
Green Pages
Career Fair
Right to Know Campaign
Today's Photos
Spotted on the Rock
Body & Soul
Shipping
Young Observer
Religion
Classified
Weather
Bermuda Calendar
Links
About Us
Contact Us
Subscribe
Electronic Edition
Advertise
Advertise Online
Registration
RSS feeds
Email Alerts
Help/FAQ
Mid-Ocean News
Code of Practice Policy
Privacy Policy
Copyright Policy
Yesterday
Sunday
Saturday
Friday
Thursday
Wednesday
Custom


Published: January 11. 2006 12:00AM
'A breach of constitutional rights'


By Stuart Roberts

Winifred Fostine-DeSilva

The Collector of Customs was accused of breaching a black Bermudian man's constitutional rights when an equally unqualified white Canadian woman was appointed as Assistant Collector in 2002.

Human rights lawyer Mark Diel represented 20-year Airport Customs Officer Troy Caines in a Human Rights Board of Inquiry � made up of Chairman Kim White, Rachel Cabot and Kevin Bean � in Supreme Court yesterday.

"My client's constitutional rights have been breached," Mr. Diel said yesterday. "He lost the opportunity to compete. Part of the scheme was to make sure this individual never got promoted."

Both Mr. Diel and Attorney General Chamber's lawyer Melvin Douglas concluded their final submissions yesterday but a decision will not be made for at least two weeks for written transcripts to be prepared.

At yesterday's hearing � which could result in Mr. Caines winning damages of $790,000 � Mr. Diel said Collector of Customs Winifred Fostine DeSilva, along with the Public Service Commission (PSC), the Department of Human Resources and the Minister of Finance, all played a role in ignoring local applicants and recruiting Canadian Joan Crown � who by their own admission did not meet the qualifications.

Mr. Caines did not have the five years management experience sought. However, he said Ms Crown did not have the required educational requirements, or job experience, as a job required a business or management science degree, while Ms Crown had an English/Italian degree.

"The local advertisement left out the word equivalent, but in the Canadian advertisement the word creeped in," he said.

However, Mr. Douglas argued that "equivalent" meant any bachelor's degree, not as Mr. Diel put it, a business or management science degree from Canada.

"Put another way, they bent the rules one way but weren't prepared to bend them the same way for my client," Mr. Diel said. "At best the advertising process was an embarrassment. It's 100 percent batty."

In addition, Governor Sir John Vereker released two fiats at the request of PSC to limit the amount of information available for the Human Rights panel, he said.

He argued an adverse inference should be drawn against PSC as it meant Mr. Caines was denied a fair hearing � particularly when his side gave all of their information to Mr. Douglas.

Mrs. Fostine DeSilva gave a "tacit acquiescence" to this manoeuvre, he said.

"She did not go to the Governor and plead for him not to do it," he said. "I accept the Collector could not disclose documents to clear her name after the fiat was issued.

"You preferred a Canadian over us in circumstances in which she didn't have the experience and neither did we but you preferred her," he said. "It's a fair inference to say PSC went to the Governor to avoid disclosing material."

Mr. Caines refused to sit an exam for the Principal Customs Officer position on the advice of his lawyer, he said, because had he failed it could have been used against him.

Mr. Caines is seeking damages of $790,000 for the difference in salary in both jobs until retirement.

However, Mr. Douglas argued that none of the respondents were Mr. Caines' employer and, therefore, the complaint had no legal basis.

"You could make the argument the Governor was his employer," Mr. Douglas said.

But if this were so, Chairman Kim White asked Mr. Douglas whether there was a conflict of interest by the Governor being allowed to issue a fiat in relation to a person he "employed."

Mr. Douglas said it was a moot point.

He accepted there were discrepancies in the advertisements but said there was no evidence of the PSC "lobbying" the Governor to conceal information.

"If you look at the fiat it used the word waiver," Mr. Douglas said.

He said it was not a PSC cover-up and there was no evidence at the fair hearing that Mr. Caines was more qualified than Ms Crown.

"He competed for the post but he was not successful, so he did not lose an opportunity," he said.

However, he admitted that some members of the public would see that justice had not been done, because of the fiat.



»  Print this article
»  Print this article with picture
»  View related stories

Message:


Your name:
Your e-mail address: 
To e-mail address:


 



 
Customs officer loses promotion fight
 
Custom officer's promotion discrimination appeal bid
 
Customs officer loses job appeal
 
Customs Officer's wife: 'We need to open the process up'
 
Customs Officer's wife: 'We need to open the process up'
 













Copyright ©2010 The Royal Gazette Ltd.
For more info or comments please contact webmaster@royalgazette.bm