Logo Logo
News Bermuda, Tuesday, February 9, 2010 Contact us

Home
News
Business
Sport
Opinion
Lifestyle
Gazette Video
Death & Funeral Notices
Special Sections
Year in Review 2009
Xmas Short Stories
Green Pages
Career Fair
Right to Know Campaign
Today's Photos
Spotted on the Rock
Body & Soul
Shipping
Young Observer
Religion
Classified
Weather
Bermuda Calendar
Links
About Us
Contact Us
Subscribe
Electronic Edition
Advertise
Advertise Online
Registration
RSS feeds
Email Alerts
Help/FAQ
Mid-Ocean News
Code of Practice Policy
Privacy Policy
Copyright Policy
Yesterday
Sunday
Saturday
Friday
Thursday
Wednesday
Custom



Published: January 15. 2008 08:21AM
Silence from Govt.–on housing law


By Ruth O'Kelly-Lynch

The Ministry of Immigration has yet to clarify its stance on the amendment which bars foreign spouses of Bermudians from owning more than one home.


Prior to last month's General Election, The Royal Gazette reported that there was confusion over the amendment with then Immigration Minister Derrick Burgess saying one thing, the former Permanent Secretary Robert Horton saying another and the Premier saying he was not sure.

Since early December The Royal Gazette has asked several times for a clarification on the law but no statement about the policy has been made.

New Minister of Immigration David Burch has also been asked to clarify the position, but no news has been forthcoming.

Mr. Burgess had accused The Royal Gazette in early December of incorrectly stating that the legislation bars Bermudians married to foreigners from owning more than one property if the foreign spouse is to benefit from it in any way, such as by living in the property or receiving rental income.

He said: "This is simply not true. A non-Bermudian spouse of a Bermudian, who does not have an interest in a property, cannot run foul of the law simply by obtaining a benefit from the land such as occupying it or receiving the benefit of rents from it."

But in July the Permanent Secretary sent a lengthy response to questions about the amendment and stated: "Bermudians are free to acquire any number of properties in Bermuda provided they use their own resources to purchase them and do not rely on the wealth of their non-Bermudian spouses.

"Should the non-Bermudian spouse receive a benefit from the additional unlicensed properties, such as the receipt of rents or by occupying the property, then that person would be appropriating the land and would be in breach of section 78."

And on a ZBM interview Premier Ewart Brown was quizzed by Gary Moreno, who is an expatriate spouse of a Bermudian.

Dr. Brown — himself married to a non-Bermudian — replied: "I don't know that it prevents the Bermudian from owning other houses. I am not sure. I don't know if a non Bermudian partner can contribute."

Since the amendment was announced a pressure group Land Opportunities for All Bermudians (LOAB) was created and has met with the former Minister. They claim the law is discriminatory.

Mr. Burgess has said it was designed to combat loopholes and fronting — the practice of foreigners obtaining property illegally by using Bermudians as a front — and to protect land resources on an Island.



»  Print this article
»  View related stories

Message:


Your name:
Your e-mail address: 
To e-mail address:


 




 
Immigration fails to clarify law
 
Premier 'not sure' if foreign spouses can 'contribute' to home purchases
 
Premier 'not sure' if foreign spouses can 'contribute' to home purchases
 
What Government says about the law
 
Spouse law may breach Human Rights Act
 

















Copyright ©2010 The Royal Gazette Ltd.
For more info or comments please contact webmaster@royalgazette.bm