'Why are the Brits upset?'
|
|
Briefing: US State spokesman Ian C. Kelly speaks at yersterday's media conference at which he answered questions on Bermuda's acceptance of former Guantanamo prisoners.
|
|
|
|
A media briefing
US State Department Acting Assistant Secretary of State for Public Affairs Ian C. Kelly concerning the resettlement for four Guantanamo Bay detainees in Bermuda.
Question: Uighurs.
Kelly: Uighurs.
Question: It's becoming increasing clear that the five Uighurs
who decided that they would agree to go to Albania really got the raw
end of the deal here.
What where do things stand with regards to Palau. And what
kind of security assurances have you given Bermuda? And then why are
the Brits upset? They seem not to have been consulted about this at
all, even though they're responsible for (inaudible) foreign affairs
and security.
Kelly: Well, let me let me just, first of all, reiterate what
the attorney general said this morning, that we're extremely grateful
to the government of Bermuda for its assistance in resettling these
these detainees. And we commend the leadership it has demonstrated on
this important issue.
We dealt directly with the government of Bermuda to make this
happen. I think just before coming down here I saw some of these
saw some of these reports of concerns of the British government.
We ar we're in very close with them. The secretary spoke with with Foreign Minister Miliband this morning. And we understand that
there are some concerns about some of the details of the resettlement, and we're confident that we can work these things through with the
government of the U.K.
Question: Was there any consultation with the Brits prior to
today about this?
Kelly: We did consult with them, but I'm not going to get into,
you know, the chronology, the exact details of when. That's, I think
that's a matter for...
Question: Well, you said that's a matter for?
Kelly: Private those are private diplomatic...
(CROSSTALK)
Question: You said we dealt directly with the government of
Bermuda to make this happen?
Kelly: Right.
Question: You are [EmDash] you are aware that Bermuda is British
territory, and that Britain...
Kelly: Right.
Question: ... is responsible for its dealings with foreign
governments, as it relates to foreign affairs...
Kelly: Right.
Question: ... foreign diplomacy and security issues?
Kelly: I think, you know...
(CROSSTALK)
Question: Why why would you bypass...
Kelly: Well, I don't think we bypassed anybody.
(CROSSTALK)
Question: ... followup, and you said we did consult with the
British government. I'm not look for an exigetical you know,
chronology here. But to be precise, did you consult with the British
government about the possibility of any of the Uighurs going to
Bermuda?
Kelly: Like I say, I'm just not going to get into the the
details about it.
Question: Well, you said you consulted with them.
(CROSSTALK)
Kelly: We consult with them constantly.
Question: Right. I know. You consult with them about all kinds
of things, including things that have nothing to do with Guantanamo.
So your statement that we consulted with them could be true and
completely not germane.
And I want to make sure that it's germane, that you did consult
with them about the possibility of the Uighurs going to Bermuda. Or,
you know, it may have been you consulted with them more generally
about Guantanamo, but not about this precise matter.
Kelly: Right. Right. You know, I may have more for you later
today. But right now, I don't have anything else.
Question: Well, was this a subject in the call between Miliband
and the secretary this morning?
Kelly: I'm not going to get into the details of it. They had a
very good conversation this morning.
Question: About the Uighurs?
Kelly: They did discuss this issue, yes.
Question: And other things?
Kelly: They discussed a number of issues as well.
Question: Is it your understanding, Ian, that Bermuda by itself
could agree and it would be legally binding, if...
Kelly: You know, I'm just not going to I'm just not going to
go there. I am not an expert in this. And I just really have to
refer you to the to the government of Bermuda.
Question: Well, is the British concern that the Uighurs could go
eventually to Britain?
Kelly: I'll refer you to the British government for that.
Question: But you said you discussed concerned with them.
Kelly: Yes.
Question: You had...
Kelly: I'm not going to tell I mean, you really have to ask
the British government what their concerns are.
Question: Ian, if you're not the expert on this, who do we ask?
Kelly: Well, like I say, we I may have some more information
for you a little later on, but, right now, I don't have (OFF-MIKE)
Question: What kind of security guarantees, or what kind of
measures are going to be taken to ensure that the good citizens of
Bermuda are safe?
Kelly: Well, I think that's really that's a question of the
Bermuda government.
Question: So you're basically dumping them off there and washing
your hands of the whole (ph) thing (ph)?
Kelly: No, no, we're not dumping them off there and washing our
hands. I just [EmDash] like I say...
Question: Well, it sounds that way.
Kelly: ... this is it's it's an ongoing process, and I
just don't have anything else for you.
Question: What about assurances that they're not going to be
able to come to the United States?
Kelly: You know, that, I think, really, is really an issue for
the Department of Justice, for in terms of homeland security
issues.
Question: But, I mean, obviously, part of this agreement with
Bermuda to take them involved some kind of security assurances, A,
that the citizens of Bermuda would be safe, and B, that the government
of Bermuda would have the adequate resources, wherewithal, will, to
make suer that these people don't just leave Bermuda...
(CROSSTALK)
Kelly: Yes, on all those issues, I really have to refer you to
the Department of Justice.
Question: Is there any sort of financial compensation offered to
the government of Bermuda, in exchange for taking these four in?
Kelly: Well, I think, any time that we we transfer detainees,
we [ we do provide some kind of modest and routine resettlement
reimbursement, but, beyond that, again, I think you'd have to ask the
Department of Justice?
Question: How much is that per person?
Kelly: How much is that per I'm not going to go into...
Question: It's a...
(CROSSTALK)
Question: ... legitimate question, I think, to ask. I mean...
Kelly: Yes, well, I just I don't have the information.
Question: Can you take that question, please?
Kelly: Well, I refer you to the Department of Justice.
Question: Well, what is the resettlement fee for? What is the
resettlement, you know, compensation for?
Is it for measures to make sure that the security is provided or
is it to make sure that they have meals, or what is it?
Kelly: Yes, I'm sorry. I have to refer you to the Department of
Justice, and I brought my wrong glasses. That's why I'm taking them
off.
Question: Well, who negotiated the agreement? Was it Dan Fried
on behalf of...
Kelly: It was an interagency process, and for the details of it,
you really have to go to the Department of Justice.
Question: No, the details of agreements between two governments
are are...
Kelly: Not always public.
(CROSSTALK)
Question: ... of the State Department.
Kelly: Yes, well, I [EmDash] I don't have them here right now, and I'm
not even sure I could share them with you right now.
Question: Let me go back to the issue of Palau (ph).
Kelly: Yes.
Question: Is if there were 17 Uighurs who had remained at
Guantanamo and four have now arrived in Bermuda is there any
decision on the where the other 13 may reside?
Kelly: You know, as I said yesterday, we're involved in ongoing
discussions with a number of governments on this issue, including with
the government of Palau. And I don't have anything to add from
yesterday.
Question: OK, so nothing's changed since then. There's...
(CROSSTALK)
Kelly: Nothing has changed since then.
Question: (inaudible) realize, Ian, that the president of the
country went on television and said that the government of Palau is
currently finalizing an agreement with the United States about the
details, but that they've already agreed to take them.
Kelly: Yes...
(CROSSTALK)
Kelly: ... we welcome...
Question: Are you disputing that?
Kelly: ... we welcome any offers to...
Question: Wait, it's not just an offer. I mean, he's talking...
Kelly: ... to accommodate these detainees.
Question: It's not just an offer. He's talking about the
finalization of an agreement that you've been negotiating. Are you...
Kelly: That's not finalized.
Question: But you're not disputing that you're in in
negotiations of an agreement.
Kelly: I'm not disputing that we're involved in talks with a
number of countries, including Palau.
Question: The impression, you know, that I guess we're getting
from this is a bit of flailing around and looking for, desperately,
for a place to put these people. So correct me if I'm wrong, but
there's a lack of information, things come up suddenly.
The Uighur community here says, "Wow, that was news to us," that
(inaudible) Bermuda. It seems very sudden. We can't get much
information from you. Isn't this an admission that there's a certain
sense of desperation to find someplace for them?
Kelly: No, that's not an admission of that at all.
This [EmDash] this is a [EmDash] a top priority for the president. On the
first day of his administration he signed an executive order to close
Guantanamo, to close the detention facility there. We are working
very hard to reach that goal of closing it within the time period the
president has set.
This is a it's a complicated process involving negotiations
wit with many different countries, some of which, of course, we've
we've talked about here.
Kelly: And it's also [EmDash] it's also an interagency process. So
it's, you know, diplomacy is not always a pretty thing, but it's [EmDash]
it's a complicated process.
Question: How much of a sore point is it with the Chinese?
Publicly, the foreign ministry has complained about it, says you
should return them to China. Privately, have you received calls from
them and at what level?
Kelly: They have pretty consistently expressed their their
concern, both publicly and privately, regarding the discussions that
we were were having that are ongoing on resettling the Uighurs
into third countries. We have taken thos those concerns on board,
but we've made it we've made it quite clear to them that we are not
going to transfer them back to China.
Question: And has there been [EmDash] what has the latest
communication with the Chinese been on this? Has the secretary spoken
with the foreign minister?
Kelly: She has not spoken to the Chinese foreign minister
for at least for a week or so.
(CROSSTALK)
Question: (inaudible)
Kelly: Well, I know I saw a press report of my counterpart in
Beijing...
Question: Today?
Kelly: ... registering a protest.
Question: Yes. No, no, I saw that, too. What I wondered was
whether there had been any non-public, you know, whether they had
contacted the State Department, not necessarily at the secretary's
level, but at some other level about this today.
Kelly: Yes. I'm not aware of it, but as I say, they've been
very consistent in conveying this message.
Dave?
Question: Ian, there's a press report today about a possible
imminent deal between the United States and Yemen to repatriate a
Yemeni from Guantanamo. Is there something to that?
Kelly: Yes, you know, I might have something on that.
I thought I had something on it.
Kelly: Yes, I'll take that question sorry.
Question: Back to China when you've made it clear to China
that you're not going to repatriate them back to China, have you also,
kind of, made clear to China that you expect them not to retaliate
against countries that might take them, like Palau, for instance?
Kelly: Well, I mean, we've made it clear to them that we're not
going to transfer them back to China. And we certainly wo I
don't know if specifically made it clear to them that they shouldn't
retaliate against countries that do receive them. And we certainly
would hope they wouldn't retaliate.
Question: Well, I mean, isn't that one of the reasons it's so
hard to find a country that will take these Uighurs, because they're
afraid of repercussions with China?
Kelly: Well, I'm not aware of that. I mean, you have to ask the
countries, themselves, if they fear retaliation.
Question: How hard (ph) do you explain to the Chinese why you
wouldn't transfer them back to China?
Kelly: You know, again, I don't really want to get into the
details of our diplomatic exchanges. I would say as a general
principle as I think I said on my first or second day of briefing
up here that we do not, as a rule, transfer prisoners to countries
in which they would have a well-founded fear of persecution.
Question: But some are going back to our countries where they...
Kelly: We wouldn't transfer any prisoners to a country where the
prisoners, themselves had or detainees would have a well-founded
fear...
Question: So Yemen is ruled out?
Kelly: Well, I don't know. Like I said, I took that question
out. I have to find that out.
Question: You said that the secretary hadn't spoken with the
Chinese foreign minister in a week?
Kelly: You know, I'll have t yes, maybe I should check on
that.
Question: Can you check on that, because I would've thought that
she would've talked to him at least about the North Korea resolution
at the U.N.
Kelly: OK, well, I'll follow up on that.
...
Question:<\p>And, as you one more thing on the Uighur issue, who was it Miliband who called the secretary or did she call him?
Kelly: I'm not sure, frankly, who initiated the call.
Question: And are ther as you're going around to these other
countries, are you now that you've managed to slip these guys into
Bermuda undercover, are you looking at other British overseas
territories to...
(LAUGHTER)
... the Falklands, maybe...
(CROSSTALK)
Kelly: We're engaged in ongoing discussions with a number of foreign governments, and I'll leave it at that.
