Driscoll warns Washington of potential impact of reinsurance tax

Make text smaller Make text larger

  • Validus Re CEO Kean Driscoll

    Validus Re CEO Kean Driscoll


Proposals by some US lawmakers to raise more taxes from non-US reinsurers — including those based in Bermuda — would damage the industry’s ability to bear more flooding and terrorism risks, a hearing in Washington heard yesterday.

The subject was touched upon by Kean Driscoll, CEO of Bermuda-based Validus Re, in response to a question from Republican Representative Dennis Ross, of Florida, during the House Financial Services’ Housing and Insurance Subcommittee hearing on “The Future of Terrorism Insurance”.

Rep Ross asked Mr Driscoll: “Would [the Obama-Neal-Menendez reinsurance tax] limit the capacity or capability of insurers and reinsurers to take on more risk from terrorism or flooding (TRIA and NFIP) and thus be counterproductive to our long term goals of reducing the size of government insurance programmes?”

Mr Driscoll replied: “Yes. Reinsurers need to be able to pool risk to gain diversification. Any limits on affiliate reinsurance would impede global risk pooling and would fragment group capital and would impede market development and likely increase consumer prices.”

Brad Kading, president and executive director of the Association of Bermuda Insurers and Reinsurers, said in response to the hearing: “I was pleased to see US Representative Dennis Ross today recognise the dangers of legislation (HR 2054 and S 991) introduced by Reps Richard Neal and Bill Pascrell and Sen Robert Menendez, and included in President Obama’s current and past budget, that would tax reinsurers and unintentionally change the tax treatment of affiliated reinsurance providers.

“As a representative of a natural disaster-prone state, Rep Ross understands the negative consequences that a tax on reinsurance would have on home and business owners in Florida.

“The Obama-Neal-Pascrell-Menendez reinsurance tax would limit the capability of insurers and reinsurers to underwrite risk for perils such as hurricanes, floods and terrorism, leading to diminished capacity and higher costs for the consumers that need coverage the most.”

You must be registered or signed-in to post comment or to vote.

Published Nov 14, 2013 at 8:00 am (Updated Nov 13, 2013 at 10:13 pm)

Driscoll warns Washington of potential impact of reinsurance tax

What you
Need to
Know
1. For a smooth experience with our commenting system we recommend that you use Internet Explorer 10 or higher, Firefox or Chrome Browsers. Additionally please clear both your browser's cache and cookies - How do I clear my cache and cookies?
2. Please respect the use of this community forum and its users.
3. Any poster that insults, threatens or verbally abuses another member, uses defamatory language, or deliberately disrupts discussions will be banned.
4. Users who violate the Terms of Service or any commenting rules will be banned.
5. Please stay on topic. "Trolling" to incite emotional responses and disrupt conversations will be deleted.
6. To understand further what is and isn't allowed and the actions we may take, please read our Terms of Service
7. To report breaches of the Terms of Service use the flag icon

Take Our Poll

  • Should people be forced to retire when they are 65 years old?
  • Yes
  • 10%
  • No
  • 89%
  • Don't know
  • 2%
  • Total Votes: 1768
  • Poll Archive

Today's Obituaries

View all Obituaries Place an obituary

Facebook Activity