Watt? Belco surcharge needs looking into

Make text smaller Make text larger


Dear Sir,

Now that concerns have been aired in the media about Belco’s policies towards those with solar installations, I would like to add my two cents’ worth.

When Belco first started paying for power sent back to the grid, their facilities charge was $30 and they used to pay the fuel surcharge for the power from the net meter customer. There was no loss on their part, as they charge the other customers using that power for the fuel surcharge.

Since the Energy Commission succumbed to the last revamp of their billing structure, the facilities charge has increased 33.17 per cent to $39.95 and they have stopped paying the fuel surcharge, but they are still charging those who use the power we generate for that wattage.

This means that they are selling our generated power at a premium while we are deprived of any benefit.

This is further compounded by Belco still charging us the surcharge for the power we draw from them. Even if we produce twice as much as we use from the grid, we still have to pay Belco.

Here is an actual calculation: in a recent month, I used 256 kilowatts from Belco and sent back 526kW, yet I had to pay them $25.24.

This is unacceptable, as they sold that 526kW to my neighbours and charged them a $71.01 fuel surcharge for it. This is actually a bonus we are paying to Belco for having installed a photovoltaic, or PV, system.

I would like to suggest to the energy commissioners that they have another look at Belco’s billing system and recommend that in all instances the power produced by the customer should negate any fuel surcharge up to the amount received from Belco and that the excess, if any, should be paid to the customer at half the prevailing surcharge rate.

Belco would still be selling that excess to our neighbours at the full rate, thus making a 50 per cent gain.

I also note a “Regulatory Authority Fee” now being applied to all customers.

If this body was appointed by the Government, their stipend should be paid by the Government and/or Belco, not the customer. Although this may seem a small charge, how many millions are being collected and where are they going?

I hope that the others who have installed solar power systems will find the time to let us know how they feel.

ASHMEAD M. ALI

Southampton

You must be registered or signed-in to post comment or to vote.

Published Sep 4, 2018 at 8:00 am (Updated Sep 4, 2018 at 7:33 am)

Watt? Belco surcharge needs looking into

What you
Need to
Know
1. For a smooth experience with our commenting system we recommend that you use Internet Explorer 10 or higher, Firefox or Chrome Browsers. Additionally please clear both your browser's cache and cookies - How do I clear my cache and cookies?
2. Please respect the use of this community forum and its users.
3. Any poster that insults, threatens or verbally abuses another member, uses defamatory language, or deliberately disrupts discussions will be banned.
4. Users who violate the Terms of Service or any commenting rules will be banned.
5. Please stay on topic. "Trolling" to incite emotional responses and disrupt conversations will be deleted.
6. To understand further what is and isn't allowed and the actions we may take, please read our Terms of Service
7. To report breaches of the Terms of Service use the flag icon

  • Take Our Poll

    • "What are your views on stop-and-search in today's Bermuda?"
    • Inconvenient but necessary
    • 69%
    • Wholly unproductive
    • 10%
    • Unfair targeting of young black males
    • 21%
    • Total Votes: 4697
    • Poll Archive

    Today's Obituaries

    eMoo Posts