Senior fights BTC over defunct business bill

Make text smaller Make text larger


A senior BTC customer has been overcharged more than $2,500 for a business that no longer exists, according to his “hugely frustrated” daughter who has struggled for months to get the matter remedied.

“We have so many monopolies in Bermuda, it’s difficult to get resolution for the man on the street — you can’t get anyone to speak to,” said the woman, a local executive who requested not to be named to protect the privacy of her 85-year-old father.

The $2,500 he has been overcharged would represent “a windfall for many seniors out there who are struggling — it’s a couple of months’ pension”.

The woman first contacted Bermuda Telephone Company in early October after happening to notice charges on her father’s bill for a business that he closed 12 years ago.

Her father, who “barely uses his mobile phone and does not use a computer”, dissolved his business and went to BTC’s St George’s branch to convert his line to residential — requesting that the business services be cancelled.

“This was done in person, as is typical in Bermuda, especially for someone of my father’s age. She confirmed that the services would be cancelled.”

While she was able to reach sales representatives, who confirmed that the charges came from the old business line, “my frustration was that I couldn’t speak to an actual person who could look into it”.

“First the rep asked if I had written correspondence confirming the cancellation, from more than a decade ago — are you kidding me?” she said. “Again, this was done in person by an honest, older man who trusted that what he was told would actually happen.

“After the rep spoke to her manager, BTC agreed to credit my father’s account $135 — less than 5 per cent of what he was overcharged.”

Earlier this month the company discovered a billing error resulting in extra charges for its business customers for their November bills. The Regulatory Authority interceded, launching an investigation and advising customers that they were not liable for disputed charges until the matter was rectified.

The woman said she had been e-mailing various staff at BTC since November 10 with redress.

“Nobody knew who to speak to. I would get put through to Digicel and then Digicel would send me back. Finding an actual person was difficult, but finding resolution was nonexistent.”

She has yet to hear back from her voice mail and e-mail complaints over the credit of $135.

The Royal Gazette contacted a senior executive at BTC last month regarding the issue, which was referred to customer care, but a response was not received by this newspaper — although the customer said she had been told on Friday that “the manager would be back on Monday and he would review then”.

“There must be records,” she said. “BTC can see the business line has not been active. There are a lot of different pieces of evidence.

“My frustration is that my dad has been pushed to the side. He’s been completely ignored as a senior citizen.”

You must be registered or signed-in to post comment or to vote.

Published Jan 10, 2017 at 8:00 am (Updated Jan 10, 2017 at 1:46 am)

Senior fights BTC over defunct business bill

What you
Need to
Know
1. For a smooth experience with our commenting system we recommend that you use Internet Explorer 10 or higher, Firefox or Chrome Browsers. Additionally please clear both your browser's cache and cookies - How do I clear my cache and cookies?
2. Please respect the use of this community forum and its users.
3. Any poster that insults, threatens or verbally abuses another member, uses defamatory language, or deliberately disrupts discussions will be banned.
4. Users who violate the Terms of Service or any commenting rules will be banned.
5. Please stay on topic. "Trolling" to incite emotional responses and disrupt conversations will be deleted.
6. To understand further what is and isn't allowed and the actions we may take, please read our Terms of Service
7. To report breaches of the Terms of Service use the flag icon

  • Take Our Poll

    • What was the biggest shock of Election 17?
    • PLP 24 OBA 12
    • 41%
    • Famous over Richards
    • 40%
    • Lister's 'miracle' against Sousa
    • 8%
    • Peets running Dunkley close
    • 3%
    • Cox's 41 votes in C14
    • 8%
    • Total Votes: 5504
    • Poll Archive

    Today's Obituaries