Right or not? Pondering the Rhodes well travelled


In light of the news regarding Bermuda’s 2020 Rhodes Scholar, I am forced to consider the legacy of Cecil Rhodes and whether it is reconcilable to accept an opportunity founded upon a legacy of genocide and colonialism. I post these thoughts not in direct response to any particular criticism — I have been overwhelmed with support — but to share my own internal reflections on the conflict which has been playing out in my own head long before the announcement.

My first name: Ryan. Irish.

My mother’s name: Robinson. English.

My father’s name: Perinchief. Something to do with French, but we don’t really know because we can’t trace our ancestry beyond a free man from St Kitts & Nevis.

My nationality: British Overseas Territories Citizen. Holder of “Bermuda status”. Juan de Bermúdez. Spanish.

The black experience is an incredibly complex contradiction.

When Cecil Rhodes established the Rhodes Trust, he did not envision that it would be taken up by people who look or think like me. Even today, the perceived “success” of many individuals seems to be almost directly proportionate to the extent by which they are willing to compromise and contradict their own identities. No doubt, it is the same story everywhere.

Choosing Howard over Oxford would have offered little relief. For even such an historically black prestigious institution owes its name to an Oliver Otis Howard — a general who became famous for unspeakable acts against Native American men, women and children.

My high school, Bermuda’s most historic, is named after an Anglo-Irish bishop whose philosophies were steeped in colonialism. “Westward the course of empire takes its way,” George Berkeley declared. His mission to create schools for colonists and Native Americans reeks of Manifest Destiny.

I say this not to cast judgment on these institutions, but simply to illustrate that whether it be a Rhodes scholarship or a Bank of N.T. Butterfield one, an Oxford course or Howard, a job at Colonial or an insurance policy there, the difference is only a matter of degree, not of kind.

They are all different branches of the same root.

In the end, I won’t argue against anyone who says that attending the University of Oxford on a scholarship named after one of the most ruthless individuals in modern history is contradictory and problematic.

The nature of colonialism and imperialism is such that its legacy is inescapable and full of discrepancies. And every day, we are forced to make decisions about how best to navigate the world using the cards we’ve been dealt, without losing ourselves entirely.

W.E.B. du Bois described this dilemma as “the double consciousness” — the internal conflict experienced by subordinated groups in an oppressive society.

In A Fanonian Perspective on Double Consciousness, T. Owens Moore writes: “In an attempt to be mentally healthy in this insane society, the oppressed or exploited can develop adaptive as well as maladaptive responses. An adaptive response might entail an accommodating mentality that vacillates between being a ‘Negro’ or an American. A maladaptive response could be to change your reality and to take on the characteristics of the oppressor. In the midst of these two diametric positions is mental conflict. To ward off mental conflict, one must generate a fever of resistance.”

And so, it is important for me to affirm openly, as many other Rhodes scholars have also done, that in the end, this scholarship does not buy my silence. On the contrary, it was paid for in my ancestors’ blood. I pledge to continue to honour them, God, my community and those who have supported me in making use of whatever tools and benefits may come from it.

Ultimately, I do not think this question will be reconciled in my lifetime. It has been debated by much greater black intellectuals, long before me. If we consider the policy of “survival pending revolution”, perhaps it is not right or wrong. It just is.

All I can ask is that I be judged not by what opportunities I am given, but how I use them instead.

Ryan Robinson Perinchief, the founder and director of Future Leaders Bermuda, is the recipient of the 2020 Rhodes scholarship. This commentary has been shared from Facebook with the permission of the writer

You must be registered or signed-in to post comment or to vote.

Published Jan 17, 2020 at 8:00 am (Updated Jan 16, 2020 at 11:04 pm)

Right or not? Pondering the Rhodes well travelled

What you
Need to
Know
1. For a smooth experience with our commenting system we recommend that you use Internet Explorer 10 or higher, Firefox or Chrome Browsers. Additionally please clear both your browser's cache and cookies - How do I clear my cache and cookies?
2. Please respect the use of this community forum and its users.
3. Any poster that insults, threatens or verbally abuses another member, uses defamatory language, or deliberately disrupts discussions will be banned.
4. Users who violate the Terms of Service or any commenting rules will be banned.
5. Please stay on topic. "Trolling" to incite emotional responses and disrupt conversations will be deleted.
6. To understand further what is and isn't allowed and the actions we may take, please read our Terms of Service
7. To report breaches of the Terms of Service use the flag icon

  • Take Our Poll

    • "The most effective politician of 2019"
    • David Burt
    • 8%
    • Wayne Caines
    • 9%
    • Craig Cannonier
    • 3%
    • Zane DeSilva
    • 10%
    • Curtis Dickinson
    • 6%
    • Michael Dunkley
    • 33%
    • Nick Kempe
    • 27%
    • Leah Scott
    • 4%
    • Total Votes: 11029
    • Poll Archive

    Today's Obituaries

    eMoo Posts