Year before Furbert Bill returns to House
It is likely to be a year before the Human Rights Amendment Act, turned down by the Senate, can be brought back to Parliament by Opposition MP Wayne Furbert.
Mr Furbert said he had sought three legal opinions after Thursday’s narrow 6-5 defeat in the Upper House.
“One lawyer told me it might come back in November — if it’s got to be 12 months, that’s how it has to be; I’m not sweating it,” he told The Royal Gazette.
The Act, which sought to define marriage as solely between a man and woman, was passed in the House of Assembly by a vote of 20-10 on July 8.
Mr Furbert said he would bring it back to Parliament unchanged, which means it will become law if passed again.
Asked about the possibility of a legal precedent granting same-sex marriage in the meantime, Mr Furbert reiterated that the European Convention on Human Rights had stated that same-sex marriage did not qualify as a human right.
“It’s been stated seven times — the Chief Justice will have to look at every other case that’s been brought up,” he said.
Burt blasts OBA pessimism
Wells heads Bermuda to famous victory
Boat driver ‘not convicted’ of causing death
Wells rises to the occasion
Proud day in London as Duffy gets OBE medal
OBA wants action on ‘flatlining economy’
Borrowing money to pay for borrowing money
Take Our Poll
- "What are your views on anonymous online commenting (trolling)?"
- Helpful to our democracy and needs to continue
- Hurtful to our democracy and needs to end
- Limits the number of people willing to give public service
- An important tool for political parties
- Total Votes: 4508
- Poll Archive