Politicians in any democracy the world over run into deep trouble when there is a public perception that integrity and honesty appear to have slipped from their agenda, and their principle focus is on political advantage rather that dealing with the major concerns of the people.

At no time should public perception be ignored on the basis that people always have strong views for and against various issues. Democracy thrives on different opinions, and the public has the last word through the ballot box.

Political egos at times boil over during heated exchanges, and the voting public become mere spectators to verbal duels aimed at gaining political points.

Although politicians are not expected to be perfect, they should be held accountable when they fall short in standards of integrity, honesty and truth.

Most would agree that is not an easy call for those who aspire to serve, but being accountable is a part of the territory. Problems usually occur when politicians develop a perception of themselves that differs from the public.

The situation gets even more complex when party allegiance and confronting an issue based on facts creates a wedge between members of a party, thus weakening party solidarity.

Any political party is less effective during infighting, especially when it concerns leadership. The other side to this is that internal conflicts occur within any political group, which is an indication that democracy works.

Free speech is a cherished part of democracy, but having that right carries responsibility.

Badly chosen words have a way of damaging credibility, often resulting in a loss of public confidence.

A glance at the American political scene shows that presidential candidates, both Democrats and Republicans, are engaged in a bitter struggle to gain support in seeking the highest office in the land at the next election.

GOP frontrunner Donald Trump recently took a pounding for claiming he saw thousands of Muslims in New Jersey cheering when the Twin Towers in New York fell during the 9/11 terrorism attacks. News organisations throughout the nation could find no evidence to support such a claim, and none of Trump’s supporters could furnish footage to back up his assertion. Not good.

Trump continues to ride a wave of leading at the GOP polls and he might survive the backlash from what most commentators say was a totally false statement. So questions remain over whether the public will overlook such a blunder or give closer scrutiny to his flamboyant style of campaigning.

When all is said and done, it will be up to the voters to determine the kind of leader they feel is best suited to lead the nation during extremely challenging times, with the face of terrorism threatening the world order.

The bottom line here is that all politicians walk a thin line when they juggle with the truth on any matter concerning the people’s business. Whether members of the Bermuda Government or the Opposition, they are expected to serve with integrity and honesty.

The Progressive Labour Party is wading through internal issues that include speculation that there is discord between ranking members over the issue of leadership.

Such developments are common in democratic settings and should be worked out within the party structure. Whatever the outcome, what is best for Bermuda is what really matters. The Bermudian people are far more important than the internal problems of any political group.

With modern communication technology that can flash a viewpoint around the world in seconds, perceptions are constantly under the microscope by the free press to assist in getting the true picture before the world.

Political arenas can at times get ugly, Bermuda included, and usually the electorate is left to judge whether elected public officials are upholding expected standards in performing their duties.

No politician is above public scrutiny on any issue that affects the welfare of our communities. The best way to avoid the microscope is to operate with transparency and integrity at all times.