Will geopolitical tensions derail markets?
Global equity markets had been bouncing back from early April’s lows as investors shifted their attention to the still relatively strong world growth outlook bolstered by favourable economic tailwinds such as the US corporate tax cut and rising employment.
However, the markets are now slumping again as new geopolitical risks emerge. Disruptive counterforces, including an escalating trade war, political showdowns in Europe and currency devaluations in Latin America are beginning to work against the synchronised global growth scenario which appeared to be in intact earlier this year.
The major averages are up slightly on the year, but that masks considerable variance between regions and sectors. For example, the tech-heavy Nasdaq market is up 9.5 per cent year-to-date, easily outperforming the broader S&P 500 stock index which has advanced by just 1.9 per cent as of this writing.
Meanwhile, Emerging Markets (EMs) as a group are down 6.5 per cent, as measured by the MSCI Emerging Market index. Within the EM index, countries such as Brazil and Argentina have been hit much harder, falling 18.1 per cent and 37.1 per cent year-to-date, respectively.
Volatility is back again this year as latent geopolitical tensions come to a head. The United States’ trade war with China and President Trump’s antagonistic approach to America’s most important trading partners has been a recent tipping point.
Initially, Trump set his sights predominantly on China in an attempt to balance the scales of unfair trade practices and intellectual property infringement. But now, many of the US’s closest allies are also being punished with tariffs and perhaps alienated altogether.
At the moment, the trade issue remains mostly unresolved, acting like the sword of Damocles hanging over the markets. Business leaders are reluctant to make longer term investments not knowing the new rules of the game.
For example, recent data show economic activity in the euro zone has been slowing down as fears of a trade war begin to take their toll. The first-quarter economic slowdown in the euro region was caused by lower trade, coinciding with Trump’s threats in March of high duties on steel and aluminium imports from global partners, including the EU. These threats turned into actual tariffs earlier this month.
The euro zone’s output expanded by 0.4 per cent during the first three months of the year, down from the 0.7 per cent growth of the previous quarter.
For the year as a whole, growth slowed to 2.5 per cent from 2.8 per cent. Germany, the euro bloc’s largest economy and main exporter, saw the growth of its output halved to 0.3 per cent during the period. German automaker Daimler AG, producer of Mercedes Benz vehicles, issued a profit warning last week due largely to China’s retaliatory tariffs on US car imports against its overseas operations.
While tariffs clearly played a role in slowing activity, Europe also has issues of its own making. The ultimate resolution of 2016’s Brexit vote in the UK remains a work in progress and recent political turmoil in Italy and Spain are creating more problems and concerns for the 19-country currency bloc.
Meanwhile, EMs have been rocked by rising US interest rates and the rebounding greenback which have sent some EM currencies into a tailspin. Upcoming elections in Mexico are a concern where a potentially disruptive left-wing candidate is leading in the polls.
Brazil also appears once again fragile as a new corruption scandal and recent truckers’ strike hamper any potential economic gains from higher commodities prices.
On the positive side, there may be hope for a resolution on trade. Many of Trump’s prior initiatives have been walked back considerably before becoming policy. Clearly, he desires better trade deals for the good of the American people, but the complexity of the global supply chain make those decisions very difficult to implement without creating substantial offsets.
If tariffs remain in place and become more onerous, rising consumer prices and retaliatory measures will hurt everyone. Elected officials will eventually need to heed this call. Already, industry leaders are complaining about the new tariffs and asking for exemptions.
Despite the rising tide of geopolitical uncertainty, valuations are arguably already reflecting more dire outcomes. Despite the political dysfunction in Washington, the US remains the “go to” place for global funds as the greenback rallies on the back of Fed interest rate increases. Moreover, the S&P 500 stock index is trading at about 17 times forward earnings, not unusually demanding by historical standards, especially when considered in within the context of the still historically low interest rate environment.
Moreover, analysts expect S&P 500 corporate profits to advance by almost 20 per cent this year and see growth of a further 10 per cent in 2019 according to Factset data. Corporate earnings are the ultimate driver of stock prices.
In the short run, US small cap stocks, especially those falling into the ‘value’ category look like a good bet for relative forward progress. Smaller companies generally possess higher domestic footprints, meaning they are less exposed to the negative economic revisions and more volatile financial conditions in the EM’s and Europe.
Furthermore, the US tax cut directly benefits the bottom line of these companies much more than the larger, multinationals which have already been paying at a lower tax rate.
The forces of geopolitical disruption have fallen heaviest on the EM markets. But now select positions are beginning to look enticing on a longer-term basis. In fact, EMs as a group are trading at just 12.1 times forward earnings which represents a discount of almost 30 per cent to the S&P 500. The EM markets are perhaps more sensitive to evolving geopolitical events, but investors with patience have more to gain when the dust settles.
As Winston Churchill was once said: “Americans can always be counted on to do the right thing … after they have exhausted all other possibilities.”
• Bryan Earle Dooley, CFA is the senior portfolio manager and general manager of LOM Asset Management Ltd in Bermuda. Please contact LOM at 292-5000 for further information
• This communication is for information purposes only. It is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument, investment product or service. Readers should consult with their brokers if such information and or opinions would be in their best interest when making investment decisions. LOM is licensed to conduct investment business by the Bermuda Monetary Authority
Planning pains for walk-in clinic
‘I just want to better myself’
Drink-drivers banned from roads
Front Street flies the flag for Pride
Man admits robbing store with pocket knife
Hot and bothered about lack of AC on buses
Boys build ‘buddy benches’
Back to school shopper reduces the hassle
James King (1938-2019)
Move to enforce ‘one boat, one mooring’ rule
Call for infrastructure blueprint
Out of politics, Nandi shifts to business
Join in the discussion on independence
Aloe Aloe, new drink is going down well
Police association to hold emergency meeting
Take Our Poll
- "What is the most significant reason for Bermuda residents choosing to leave the island?"
- Too small
- Different way of life
- Cost of living
- Gang activity and general crime
- Jobs/professional advancement
- Attitudes towards gays
- Total Votes: 5235
- Poll Archive