Oh, the symbolism of Germany’s World Cup exit

  • Over and out: fans In Hamburg react after Germany is eliminated from the World Cup after defeat to South Korea (Photograph by Ulrich Perrey/AP)

    Over and out: fans In Hamburg react after Germany is eliminated from the World Cup after defeat to South Korea (Photograph by Ulrich Perrey/AP)


The German national team’s disgraceful exit from the World Cup on Wednesday may be just a football defeat, but it feels like more than that: the expression of an anxious, luckless moment of hesitation and uncertainty for Germany.

I moved to Berlin in 2014, during the previous World Cup, in which a joyfully confident German squad didn’t just squeeze its opponents like a ruthless machine, in the style of its predecessors, but wove lace around them with smart passing and stunning speed. The 7-1 victory over Brazil had a dreamlike quality but was somehow expected from a team that combined the imagination of players of Middle Eastern origin, Mesut Özil and Sami Khedira; the easy, cool athleticism of Jérôme Boateng, son of a Ghanaian father; the chivalry and daring of Polish-born Miroslav Klose; and Lukas Podolski, with the bulldog tenacity and engineer-like precision of Bavarian Catholic Bastian Schweinsteiger.

I know this is a collection of national character clichés, but football thrives on them. At its best, it reminds nations of their root qualities and strengths. Modern Germany, which Monocle magazine had ranked No 1 in the world in soft power in 2013, was easy to understand — like those players’ varied backgrounds and the magical way their skills and characters merged into a coherent whole, a Mannschaft. That team promised the vision of a country recreated, enhanced by the creativity of newcomers, cured of a horrible past with its hatreds and divisions.

German politics also looked hopeful at the time. Two parties that won a combined 67.5 per cent of the vote in late September 2013, Angela Merkel’s Christian Democrats and the Social Democrats, succeeded in forming a coalition by late November. Its programme combined the fiscal conservatism of the Centre Right with centre-left sensibilities. Merkel was one of Europe’s most experienced leaders, a wily negotiator who was proving indispensable in every crisis and who was able to uphold European values — not least by standing up to Russian president Vladimir Putin, whose annexation of Crimea was the reason I left my native Russia. I could identify with the style and substance of Merkel’s governance just as I could identify with the 2014 national team.

It’s harder four years later, with other German clichés coming to the foreground. The German word “angst” exists also now in English because it means something more than just fear. The Brothers Grimm defined it in their German Dictionary as “not just a lack of courage but a torturous worry, a general condition of doubt and of being squeezed”. Angst comes from the root “eng”, which means tight, narrow. Luther described it as the feeling of unhappiness that works “as if the wide world were too narrow for me”.

It seemed to fit the 2018 Germany squad perfectly. Özil looked aimless and petulant when he was on the pitch at all; Boateng got sent off; Khedira was a shadow of his former self; Podolski and Klose had retired. A spastic anxiety showed in the imprecise passing, the uncertain defensive playing, the trembling desperation of last-minute attempts to replicate the machine-like quality of previous teams, if not the inspiration of the 2014 one.

A similar bumbling angst permeates politics and government. The present ruling coalition took from September until mid-March to put together, almost six months of fretting, recriminations and doubts, and it only represented 53.4 per cent of the vote; it barely gets 50 per cent support in current polls. Merkel’s negotiating magic has faded, though the prowess is still there. Other European leaders sense her weakness and aren’t eager to help. The future of her government is threatened by a needless quarrel with her Bavarian allies from the CSU, who insist on reintroducing border controls to be able to push back asylum seekers who register in other EU countries but travel to wealthier Germany to seek benefits.

There’s no evidence that such “asylum tourism” is widespread, immigration has slowed considerably since 2015 and 2016, immigrant crime is down. The CSU, headed by Interior Minister Horst Seehofer, is digging in its heels to do better in October’s state election in Bavaria, but polls there don’t show any gains for the party from the fight. Yet angst isn’t rational: It’s the perfect foil for German practicality. Seehofer’s angst is making him as jittery as the average German player in the final ten minutes of the disastrous game against South Korea and it’s making Merkel’s position as uncertain as that of national team coach Joachim Löw.

The possibility of an inexplicable economic slowdown — in 2014 the German economy grew 1.9 per cent after two years of 0.5 per cent growth — and the political instability are not a fitting background for football victories. Football is a sensitive barometer of a nation’s spirits. Germany’s are in a slump.

What I’ve learnt in these four years, though, is that Germans are unrivalled at pulling themselves by the hair out of any self-created mess. Angst is only temporary. This is just a moment of hesitation that comes before regrouping and rebuilding, on and off the pitch.

Leonid Bershidsky is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering European politics and business. He was the founding editor of the Russian business daily Vedomosti and founded the opinion website Slon.ru

You must be registered or signed-in to post comment or to vote.

Published Jun 29, 2018 at 8:00 am (Updated Jun 28, 2018 at 11:57 pm)

Oh, the symbolism of Germany’s World Cup exit

What you
Need to
Know
1. For a smooth experience with our commenting system we recommend that you use Internet Explorer 10 or higher, Firefox or Chrome Browsers. Additionally please clear both your browser's cache and cookies - How do I clear my cache and cookies?
2. Please respect the use of this community forum and its users.
3. Any poster that insults, threatens or verbally abuses another member, uses defamatory language, or deliberately disrupts discussions will be banned.
4. Users who violate the Terms of Service or any commenting rules will be banned.
5. Please stay on topic. "Trolling" to incite emotional responses and disrupt conversations will be deleted.
6. To understand further what is and isn't allowed and the actions we may take, please read our Terms of Service
7. To report breaches of the Terms of Service use the flag icon

  • Take Our Poll

    • "What are your views on anonymous online commenting (trolling)?"
    • Helpful to our democracy and needs to continue
    • 25%
    • Hurtful to our democracy and needs to end
    • 59%
    • Limits the number of people willing to give public service
    • 10%
    • An important tool for political parties
    • 6%
    • Total Votes: 4508
    • Poll Archive

    Today's Obituaries

    eMoo Posts