Westminster style should be scrapped immediately

Make text smaller Make text larger

  • Dame Lois Browne-Evans

    Dame Lois Browne-Evans


Some years ago Dame Lois Browne-Evans said in a speech, “People complain about the Westminster system, but the problem is they don’t know how to improve upon it”. Her comments were heartfelt and, after serving a long and distinguished career in Parliament, must be given weighty consideration.

Just like the 16th-century Reformation that was sparked by Martin Luther typified by the 90 items of discontent, which he placed on the door of the Church, similarly I think we can begin the challenge to which Dame Lois eludes by looking squarely at things that we do not like or wish to improve upon.

Admittedly, these issues may not be of concern to everyone, but they are items that I would like to see changed:

1, I do not like that the general public have no hand in the choice of the leader of the country.

2, I do not like that the general public have no hand in the selection of the Senate.

3, I do not like that the general public do not choose who should run for a party.

4, I detest the thought that a small committee of seven or eight called a selection committee determines who can run for a party.

5, I detest that a registered voter cannot or does not have a right to stand for any party of choice and be nominated by his peer constituents.

6, I do not like that after an individual is elected by the constituents, they have no say over the performance or the discipline of the individual, a privilege that belongs to the party.

7. I do not like that as a member of the electorate, I have to wait for the parliamentarian to propose legislation. Should they become derelict in that regard, I as a voting public have no mechanism to cause a motion that will receive a vote in Parliament or cause a binding referendum.

Those are only seven points of discontent that I have with our present political system, and there are more on a functional level. If we fix any of them, and the answers to how are obvious, it will represent a significant departure from the Westminster style.

It indeed may still be called Westminster, but will certainly elevate the power and status of the electorate and renew the process of democratisation.

You must be registered or signed-in to post comment or to vote.

Published Aug 22, 2018 at 8:00 am (Updated Aug 22, 2018 at 8:09 am)

Westminster style should be scrapped immediately

What you
Need to
Know
1. For a smooth experience with our commenting system we recommend that you use Internet Explorer 10 or higher, Firefox or Chrome Browsers. Additionally please clear both your browser's cache and cookies - How do I clear my cache and cookies?
2. Please respect the use of this community forum and its users.
3. Any poster that insults, threatens or verbally abuses another member, uses defamatory language, or deliberately disrupts discussions will be banned.
4. Users who violate the Terms of Service or any commenting rules will be banned.
5. Please stay on topic. "Trolling" to incite emotional responses and disrupt conversations will be deleted.
6. To understand further what is and isn't allowed and the actions we may take, please read our Terms of Service
7. To report breaches of the Terms of Service use the flag icon

  • Take Our Poll

    • "What are your views on stop-and-search in today's Bermuda?"
    • Inconvenient but necessary
    • 69%
    • Wholly unproductive
    • 10%
    • Unfair targeting of young black males
    • 21%
    • Total Votes: 4697
    • Poll Archive

    Today's Obituaries

    eMoo Posts