Women investors more likely to keep calm
If extreme market swings have become the new norm, look to women of the investing world to keep calm and carry on.
Men are four times more likely to withdraw from investments during periods of turbulence, claims a new study from Nutmeg Saving and Investment Ltd., a Europe-based robo-adviser.
Its researchers focused on violent price moves in the FTSE 100 Index over the past six years, defined as any time the gauge swung by more than 1.5 times its normal monthly volatility. They said that out of 50,000 UK-based investors on the Nutmeg platform, women more often held their positions steady in the grip of events like the Greek debt panic in 2013 or February’s market correction.
The study sits alongside those from Morningstar Inc which found that, on average, women’s approach to risk gave them an edge as active money managers, particularly in fixed income.
“It’s good to see that female investors are staying the course during periods of market volatility,” said Shaun Port, chief investment officer at the London-based company. “This is likely to put them in a better financial position in the long-term.”
Still, an overwhelming majority across both genders stayed the course during the volatile events — a mere 2.4 per cent adjusted their risk tolerance or sold investments. Among those who did sell, however, men made up by far the largest group, according to Nutmeg.
A model experience
Mothers decry children riding motorcycles
Customers bemused to find Rosebank closed
Inmate says Wolffe confessed to robbery
Licensed venues questioned on event flyers
Local lionfish grow faster and larger
Checkmates: brothers take New York by storm
‘Giant who is gone too soon’
Lawyers clash over Brown patient files
Parents ‘could strike’ over TN Tatem plan
Robbins stars as robot on Netflix
Docksider bar beefs up security
Unlicensed drink-driver nabbed back-to-back
Pancakes and pyjamas for breakfast
App to show electric vehicle renters around
Take Our Poll
- "What is your view of finance minister Curtis Dickinson's first Budget?"
- Sensible, balanced approach with no new taxes
- Disappointing, with lack of public spending cuts
- Ignores serious long-term debt, healthcare and pension issues
- Tax increases were unnecessary as the Government needs no more money
- Total Votes: 4209
- Poll Archive