Log In

Reset Password

Israel, democracy, and the importance of standards

Institutions, laws, and practices: Israelis attend a rally against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu outside the Knesset, Israel's parliament in Jerusalem, in March, 2025. Letter writer AJ Rodriguez argues that few other Middle East nations protect freedom of speech as Israel does. (Photograph by Ohad Zwigenberg/AP)

Dear Sir,

Jonathan Starling’s recent commentary in The Royal Gazette, entitled “About Israel, democracy and homonationalism”, which criticises Israel’s democratic character, emphasises the need for consistent standards of accuracy, proportion, and context in public discussion.

While criticism of any nation is valid, it should be based on verifiable facts rather than ideological framing.

Unlike others in a vastly undemocratic region, Israel is a functioning liberal democracy. It holds competitive elections, maintains an independent judiciary, protects freedom of speech and religion, and sustains a diverse civil society. These attributes are recognised by various democratic indices and international observers. Criticism that overlooks these realities or treats Israel as uniquely illegitimate does not help public understanding; it distorts it.

Much of the recent criticism relies on alleging motives rather than examining evidence. This approach replaces analysis with assumptions and causes readers to judge intent instead of facts. Democracies should be evaluated based on their institutions, laws, and practices — not on speculative interpretations of purpose.

Context is also crucial. Israel operates in a volatile region characterised by authoritarianism, political repression, and ongoing conflict. Any fair assessment must consider this broader environment, including the security threats Israel faces and the democratic limits it still operates under. Leaving out this context provides an incomplete picture.

Criticism of Israeli policies should be specific, well-sourced, and proportional. It should differentiate between individual policy choices and the core character of the state. Broad claims that blur these lines risk misleading readers rather than informing them.

Mr Editor, a free press plays a crucial role in democracy. That role is best served when opinion sections uphold high standards and reject ideological shortcuts. Readers deserve commentary that clarifies issues, promotes informed debate, and applies consistent principles — especially on complex and important topics like Israel and the Middle East.

AJ RODRIGUEZ

Christian Outreach & Research Analyst

Partnership of Christians and Jews | Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting and Analysis