Log In

Reset Password
BERMUDA | RSS PODCAST

Police review how they handle crime reports after ‘inaction’ complaint

Stephen Corbishley, the Commissioner of Police (File photograph)

The Bermuda Police Service has reviewed the way it handles reports of crime by the public after a woman complained of “inaction” over her stolen motorcycle.

Commissioner of Police Stephen Corbishley launched a “full review” earlier this month when Nikki Gerrior claimed in a post on social media that officers refused to view video footage of her motorcycle being stolen.

Mr Corbishley said he “read with concern” her post on June 2 saying that when she reported the theft, police did not attend the scene and told her to “keep a look out for it”.

Responding to questions from The Royal Gazette, Mr Corbishley said: “Whilst it is not unreasonable to ask a member of the public, who may notify us of CCTV material, to initially inform us what it contains, it was clear in this case a follow up action was required and I am pleased with comments I received from Ms Gerrior with regard to our subsequent response.

“The BPS deals with community issues on a 24 hour basis and on the odd occasion, the advice given may need to be revisited. As such, we have reviewed our practices with station duty officers and non-emergency call handlers’ response.”

Mr Corbishley said he asked officers to attend Ms Gerrior’s residence in support of the investigation which was “to the satisfaction of the victim”.

Ms Gerrior confirmed that police visited her the day after the crime and were "helpful and apologetic“.

She wrote an updated post at the time saying: “They’re viewing the security footage and walking the neighbourhood. That neighbourhood walk may have done more yesterday when we initially called so hopefully the policy will change and they will come to the scene when called.”

Mr Corbishley stressed the value of CCTV footage in helping to identify the perpetrators of crime. However, he advised members of the public to hand such evidence in to the police rather than posting it on social media.

“The reason for this is twofold,” Mr Corbishley said. “Firstly, there are rules of evidence in relation to identification that must be followed in the justice process and secondly, there may be some occasions where a person has acted innocently and has been wrongly presented across social media.”

You must be Registered or to post comment or to vote.

Published June 24, 2021 at 7:52 am (Updated June 24, 2021 at 7:35 am)

Police review how they handle crime reports after ‘inaction’ complaint

What you
Need to
Know
1. For a smooth experience with our commenting system we recommend that you use Internet Explorer 10 or higher, Firefox or Chrome Browsers. Additionally please clear both your browser's cache and cookies - How do I clear my cache and cookies?
2. Please respect the use of this community forum and its users.
3. Any poster that insults, threatens or verbally abuses another member, uses defamatory language, or deliberately disrupts discussions will be banned.
4. Users who violate the Terms of Service or any commenting rules will be banned.
5. Please stay on topic. "Trolling" to incite emotional responses and disrupt conversations will be deleted.
6. To understand further what is and isn't allowed and the actions we may take, please read our Terms of Service
7. To report breaches of the Terms of Service use the flag icon