No evidence to support lawyer’s comments – The Royal Gazette | Bermuda News, Business, Sports, Events, & Community

Log In

Reset Password

No evidence to support lawyer’s comments

Dear Sir,

Much has been written recently about the deplorable conduct of defence lawyer Charles Richardson, who has been rightly castigated for his cowardly, heartless attack on a 13-year-old victim of statutory rape as he endeavoured to get a lighter sentence for his client.

Mr Richardson stated in a subsequent interview he was merely following instructions from his client and was duty-bound to present “evidence” before the courts.

It is quite evident that Mr Richardson's definition of “evidence” is not consistent with the criteria used by the very courts he practises in on a regular basis.

As a consequence, he made a number of statements that not only insulted and brought the young child's character into question but he did so without presenting any supporting evidence whatsoever — at least according to respective news accounts.

Those statements are as follows:

“Young women actively pursue older men and they lie to them. He was led to believe she was older than she was, but it's not a defence because of her age.”

He told the court the victim had also been in contact with other men, but Chez Rogers was the only one who had been identified.

These are serious allegations and accusations that are disturbing. However, what is most disturbing is that Mr Richardson could make them in a court of law without what appears to be not any substantiating evidence, and do so with impunity.

That cannot be right, as in the absence of text messages, e-mails, voicemails or Facebook exchanges, etc, what was stated was hearsay and came from a man who admitted to statutory rape.

That cannot be right, as such serious accusations — especially against a child victim — should not be allowed in court without supporting evidence to back them up.

Unfortunately, this seems to be common practice among some in the legal fraternity and needs to be addressed if we as a society wish to protect our young children who have been victimised.

Mr Richardson then went from the sublime to the ridiculous, audaciously stating: “Maybe there should be some statute against young women who do this.”

My response to that incredulous suggestion is that maybe it's time for a statute that prevents lawyers, or anyone for that matter, making such damning accusations without supporting evidence to substantiate those claims.



It is The Royal Gazette's policy not to allow comments on stories regarding court cases. As we are legally liable for any libellous or defamatory comments made on our website, this move is for our protection as well as that of our readers.

Defence lawyer Charles Richardson (File photograph)

You must be registered or signed-in to post comment or to vote.

Published July 22, 2020 at 9:00 am (Updated July 22, 2020 at 8:53 am)

No evidence to support lawyer’s comments

What you
Need to
1. For a smooth experience with our commenting system we recommend that you use Internet Explorer 10 or higher, Firefox or Chrome Browsers. Additionally please clear both your browser's cache and cookies - How do I clear my cache and cookies?
2. Please respect the use of this community forum and its users.
3. Any poster that insults, threatens or verbally abuses another member, uses defamatory language, or deliberately disrupts discussions will be banned.
4. Users who violate the Terms of Service or any commenting rules will be banned.
5. Please stay on topic. "Trolling" to incite emotional responses and disrupt conversations will be deleted.
6. To understand further what is and isn't allowed and the actions we may take, please read our Terms of Service
7. To report breaches of the Terms of Service use the flag icon