Log In

Reset Password

Mangrove Nine Trial (1970-1972)

A flyer calling for justice for the Mangrove Nine in August 1970

In acknowledgement of Black History Month, The Royal Gazette continues the publication of stories throughout February on African-American, Black Bermudian and global African people, events and institutions, and their contributions in history

The Mangrove Nine Trial was Britain’s most influential Black Power trial. In Britain, descendants from the Caribbean, Africa or South Asia, who were mainly immigrants from former British colonies, were considered to be “Black”. The London police and the British Home Office, responsible for immigration, security, and law and order, orchestrated the arrest and trial of nine Black leaders in 1970 to discredit London’s growing Black Power movement.

The Mangrove trial focused on the police harassment of the Mangrove restaurant in West London’s Notting Hill area, which was owned by Frank Crichlow, a Trinidadian-born community activist. The restaurant was the heart of the Caribbean community and was also popular with White and Black celebrities. Because Crichlow was a Black Power activist, police raided his restaurant 12 times between January 1969 and July 1970, calling the Mangrove a den of drugs, despite not finding any evidence.

In response to this intense police harassment, Crichlow filed a complaint to the Race Relations Board, accusing the police of racial discrimination. His employee, Darcus Howe, a Trinidadian-born Black Power activist, encouraged Crichlow to work with the British Black Panthers in London to organise a demonstration against police harassment of the Mangrove.

On August 9, 1970, 150 protesters marched to local police stations and were met by 200 police, who initiated the violence that ensued. Nine protest leaders were arrested and charged with incitement to riot: Crichlow, Howe, who later became a BBP member, Althea Jones-Lecointe, head of the BBP, Barbara Beese, BBP member, Rupert Boyce, Rhodan Gordon, Anthony Innis, Rothwell Kentish and Godfrey Millett.

Initially, the court dismissed the charges because the statements of 12 officers were ruled to be inadmissible, as they equated Black radicalism with criminal intent. However, the Director of Public Prosecutions reinstated the charges and the defendants were rearrested.

The nine defendants used a radical legal strategy in the subsequent trial. Howe and Jones-Lecointe defended themselves, arguing that this was a political trial. The radical lawyer Ian McDonald represented Beese and co-ordinated the defence of Howe and Jones-Lecointe with the other defendants’ lawyers.

Howe and McDonald argued for the right to an all-Black jury under the Magna Carta’s “jury of peers” clause. McDonald cited case law allowing Welsh miners to have an all-Welsh jury that led to the practice of selecting juries from the defendant’s neighbourhood. The conservative judge rejected these arguments. During jury selection, the defence dismissed 63 potential jurors, ensuring that there were only two Blacks on the 12-person jury.

During the 55-day trial Jones-Lecointe described police persecution of Notting Hill’s Black community. Howe exposed inconsistencies in police testimony, and a police officer had to leave the courtroom when he was seen signalling to prosecution witnesses as they testified. Meanwhile, outside the courtroom, the BBP organised pickets and distributed flyers to win popular support. Ultimately, the jury acquitted all nine on the charge of rioting.

When Judge Edward Clarke stated that there was evidence of racial hatred on both sides, this was the first time a British court judge acknowledged racial discrimination and wrongdoing by the London police. The Mangrove Nine gathered broad public support for the fight against police racism in Britain and showed that the fight for racial justice could be won.

Source: Robin Bunce & Paul Field, “Mangrove Nine: the court challenge against police racism in Notting Hill,” The Guardian (November 29, 2010) https://www.theguardian.com/law/2010/nov/29/mangrove-nine-40th-anniversary; Joshua Guild, “You can’t go home again: Migration, citizenship, and black community in postwar New York and London,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of History, Yale University, 2007); Vicky Iglikowski & Rowena Hillel, “Rights, resistance and racism: the story of the Mangrove Nine,” The National Archives (October 21, 2015), https://blog.nationalarchives.gov.uk/blog/rights-resistance-racism-story-mangrove-nine/; “When cops raided a hip 1970s London café, Britain’s Black Power movement rose up,” Timeline, https://timeline.com/cops-raided-a-1970s-london-cafe-britains-black-power-movement-ff855e7b23f0

You must be Registered or to post comment or to vote.

Published February 16, 2022 at 7:59 am (Updated February 16, 2022 at 6:08 pm)

Mangrove Nine Trial (1970-1972)

What you
Need to
1. For a smooth experience with our commenting system we recommend that you use Internet Explorer 10 or higher, Firefox or Chrome Browsers. Additionally please clear both your browser's cache and cookies - How do I clear my cache and cookies?
2. Please respect the use of this community forum and its users.
3. Any poster that insults, threatens or verbally abuses another member, uses defamatory language, or deliberately disrupts discussions will be banned.
4. Users who violate the Terms of Service or any commenting rules will be banned.
5. Please stay on topic. "Trolling" to incite emotional responses and disrupt conversations will be deleted.
6. To understand further what is and isn't allowed and the actions we may take, please read our Terms of Service
7. To report breaches of the Terms of Service use the flag icon