Log In

Reset Password

Tomato shortage in Britain a taste of what’s to come

First Prev 1 2 Next Last
A girl walks by empty fruit and vegetable shelves at an Asda in East London. British people have had to ration tomatoes and cucumbers for the past two weeks amid a shortage of fresh vegetables. Officials blame the problem on recent bad weather in Spain and North Africa, but with other European countries not suffering the same shortages, some people question if Brexit is to blame (Photograph by Yui Mok/PA/AP)

The lack of tomatoes in British supermarkets is a little disconcerting when you are used to eating what you want, whenever you want. Thanks to global supply chains, the British have become accustomed to eating avocados in the depths of winter and spinach at the height of summer. Now, as supermarkets ration cucumbers and bell peppers, our salad days may be over.

Of course, bare shelves are not completely unprecedented these days. The great toilet roll and pasta shortages of the 2020 pandemic are gone but not forgotten. But the dearth of produce in 2023 may just be a taste of what’s to come as the climate crisis screws up weather patterns around the world.

Britain imports 46 per cent of its food, with self-sufficiency at about 54 per cent in fresh vegetables — tomatoes, although technically a fruit, count as a vegetable here — and just 16 per cent in fruit. This is highly dependent on the season: from December to March, the nation imports 95 per cent of its tomatoes and 90 per cent of lettuce. When it works, it’s great. Some imported foods actually have a lower carbon footprint than the home-grown stuff — a 2009 study found that importing lettuce from Spain to Britain during winter results in three to eight times lower emissions than producing it locally.

But the collision of Brexit, the energy crisis and climate change have wrenched salad off the menu for the next few weeks at least.

Crop yields are suffering after a cold snap in Spain and floods in Morocco — and the British rely on these countries to feed us in the winter. Meanwhile, high gas prices have put off domestic and Dutch growers from planting in greenhouses over the cold months. Some growers actually found it far more profitable to sell their gas contracts than grow food. We are yet to feel the full brunt of Brexit’s impact on our food supply chains, as border controls on food coming from the European Union are not due to be introduced until January 1, 2024, but it is striking how supermarkets on the Continent have tomatoes and peppers in abundance.

Although Britain’s great salad shortage will be temporary, hopefully, it highlights the very real global problem of food security.

With the world’s food supply built on teetering blocks of super-suppliers — 76 per cent of global maize exports come from only four countries, and 86 per cent of the world’s soybeans are grown in just three nations, for example — and just-in-time supply chains, it does not take much of a shock to cause shortages in even the most food-secure countries. And you can bet those shocks will start coming faster as the climate crisis increases the intensity and frequency of droughts, floods and other weird weather events. In the meantime, natural gas is only going to get more expensive as fossil fuels are eventually phased out, making life harder for growers and farmers, who are already diversifying away from food to make ends meet.

The other issue, of course, is that agriculture also happens to be one of the leading causes of climate change. From field to supermarket, food accounts for 26 per cent of global greenhouse gas emissions, thanks mostly to land-use change and a proliferation of methane-belching animals.

So, if we are going to build a sustainable, resilient food supply, then we are going to have to change what we eat and how we grow it. Thankfully, that does not have to look like environment secretary Therese Coffey’s suggestion of “turnips”. There are ways to boost domestic production and move towards net zero at the same time.

Take two giant greenhouses in England, covering 70 acres and growing about 12 per cent of Britain’s tomatoes. Unlike standard gas-powered greenhouses, these use waste heat from adjacent water-treatment works to warm themselves by way of industrial heat pumps, reducing CO₂ emissions by 75 per cent. Future projects by developer Oasthouse Ventures plan to capture and use waste carbon dioxide from water plants in the greenhouses as well — to speed up the growth of the tomatoes or other plants, growers increase the amount of CO₂ inside.

According to Andy Allen, the director of Oasthouse Ventures, there are about 40 potential sites in Britain that could use the same method, recycling waste heat and CO₂ to enable Britain to grow much more of its own food — or even flowers — throughout the year with a fraction of the carbon footprint. Although they are more expensive to build than standard gas-powered greenhouses, the economies of scale, increased yields and better efficiency mean it is more cost-effective in the long term.

This is the kind of innovation we will need to reach our net zero and food security goals, but Britain is not making it easy. Last year, the company had to abandon a plan to build two greenhouses between a sewage works and an abattoir in Wrexham, Wales. The local planning office rejected the proposal for reasons related to its location in the countryside and impact on the landscape — grounds that were later found to be unjustified upon an appeal. It was eventually approved, but by then the Government’s non-domestic Renewable Heat Incentive scheme had ended, meaning the project had to be ditched.

Oasthouse Ventures is now hoping to get planning permission for two other low-carbon greenhouse projects in England, which, if approved, would produce 54,400 tonnes of tomatoes a year. In 2021, Britain produced just 68,300 tonnes, so it would nearly double the nation’s tomato production. But the Wrexham incident has cost a lot of money and time. Allen says the company is now also looking at expanding to the United States, citing a more pro-business attitude than in Britain.

It is a frustrating example of how red tape, nimbyism and a lack of long-term thinking in government is holding back both food security and the net-zero transition. Britain needs a radical overhaul of its land use, food and planning strategies, and quickly.

There are plenty of other solutions that Britain, and others, will need to get behind to strengthen food security, such as embracing technologies including vertical farming, precision fermentation and genetically modified crops. Regenerative agricultural methods show promise in improving both yields and biodiversity. Growers have called for a more reliable workforce and fairer retail negotiations, as well as investment into better water capture and storage to stave off droughts. Britain is likely to always be dependent on imports, but it could also diversify its suppliers so that when drought hits one region, the risk is mitigated.

This will not be the last time that climate change threatens to empty supermarket shelves, but exciting solutions already exist to mitigate the problem. The Government just has to start believing in more than turnips.

Lara Williams is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering climate change

• Lara Williams is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering climate change

You must be Registered or to post comment or to vote.

Published March 06, 2023 at 7:40 am (Updated March 06, 2023 at 7:40 am)

Tomato shortage in Britain a taste of what’s to come

What you
Need to
1. For a smooth experience with our commenting system we recommend that you use Internet Explorer 10 or higher, Firefox or Chrome Browsers. Additionally please clear both your browser's cache and cookies - How do I clear my cache and cookies?
2. Please respect the use of this community forum and its users.
3. Any poster that insults, threatens or verbally abuses another member, uses defamatory language, or deliberately disrupts discussions will be banned.
4. Users who violate the Terms of Service or any commenting rules will be banned.
5. Please stay on topic. "Trolling" to incite emotional responses and disrupt conversations will be deleted.
6. To understand further what is and isn't allowed and the actions we may take, please read our Terms of Service
7. To report breaches of the Terms of Service use the flag icon