Log In

Reset Password

Sole custody ‘worst possible outcome’

An eminent social work professor has advocated the benefits of shared parenting, as opposed to the sole custody model, in cases of separation and divorce.

Speaking on the topic of estrangement between children and parents, Dr Edward Kruk called for urgent change to the current “winner-takes-all” approach that he said does not benefit children or parents, and can lead instead to disastrous consequences.

In his speech “Shared Parenting: Moving Bermuda Forward”, given at the Hamilton Rotary Club this week, Dr Kruk said that the removal of a primary parent can fuel family violence, parental alienation and parental disengagement.

All of which, he says, can threaten children's physical and emotional security.

“Unfortunately, as in Bermuda, governments and legislatures have been reluctant to legislate shared parenting, as a result of a number of myths and misperceptions about the concept,” he said.

Dr Kruk suggests shared parenting as a viable alternative to the existing model, as recent research has shown that children in shared parenting homes fare significantly better than those in sole custody arrangements.

He said that shared parenting guarantees that a child maintains a relationship with both parents, and that each parent retains custody and responsibility for their children, unless there is a finding that the child is in need of protection from one or both parents.

He added that shared parenting has also been shown to decrease parental conflict and prevent family violence.

“When one looks at the data, it becomes clear that the sole custody system seems almost tailor-made to produce the worst possible outcome,” Dr Kruk said.

“So we need to remove child custody from the adversarial arena and respect the primary bond between children and both of their parents.”

Shared parenting also reflects children's and parents' preferences and views about their needs and best interests, according to Dr Kruk.

He says it has to be the way forward. “On the matter of child custody, there is a marked disconnect between public opinion and the opinion of the professional elites who defend the status quo,” he added.

“Public opinion polls consistently support a legal presumption of shared parenting, even in high conflict cases.

“It is the responsibility of social institutions, such as the family law system, to support, not undermine, parents in the fulfilment of their responsibilities to their children's needs.”

Dr Kruk is a child and family social worker and social work professor at the University of British Columbia.

He has worked with children and families in both Canada and Britain, in various capacities, for more than 30 years.

You must be Registered or to post comment or to vote.

Published December 06, 2014 at 8:00 am (Updated December 06, 2014 at 1:23 am)

Sole custody ‘worst possible outcome’

What you
Need to
1. For a smooth experience with our commenting system we recommend that you use Internet Explorer 10 or higher, Firefox or Chrome Browsers. Additionally please clear both your browser's cache and cookies - How do I clear my cache and cookies?
2. Please respect the use of this community forum and its users.
3. Any poster that insults, threatens or verbally abuses another member, uses defamatory language, or deliberately disrupts discussions will be banned.
4. Users who violate the Terms of Service or any commenting rules will be banned.
5. Please stay on topic. "Trolling" to incite emotional responses and disrupt conversations will be deleted.
6. To understand further what is and isn't allowed and the actions we may take, please read our Terms of Service
7. To report breaches of the Terms of Service use the flag icon