Log In

Reset Password

Letters to the Editor, January 18

Former Premier Ewart Brown

Thanks, Ewart!January 17, 2011Dear Sir,Thank you, Ewart.Fast ferries broken down!Garbage collection vehicles broken down.Seventeen lights out from Shelly Bay to Blackwatch Pass on North Shore Road.Thirty-six lights out from Shelly Bay to Southampton Princess via Flatts Hill, Collectors Hill, South Shore, Middle Rd.PETER PROFITHamilton ParishPs Perhaps that is why so many morons have their ‘fog' lights on. There is however, no fog and these lights only blind the oncoming traffic.PPs If you installed two speed cameras in Flatts Village, facing east and west, you could eliminate the National Debt in six months.Lovely indeedJanuary 17, 2011Dear Sir,St George's is the place for Space,Space is the Golf Course,The Golf Course is mowed regularly,Is peaceful and free,Deserted, as too the Towne,But for the chickensand no sign of a Park HyattLovely indeed.OHHOWITUSEDTOBESt George'sChange this fish ruleJanuary 15, 2011Dear Sir,I've just completed reading a list of “restricted fishing regulations”, those that are required of a person who lands fish from local waters and what types are permitted. Yet I hadn't seen where it states the size of certain fish were permitted in landing (there is regulation size for lobsters).Now, it is possible, I had somehow overlooked that particular “law”, but the point I am getting to is this. We are told we cannot land certain fish if that particular species of fish is too small and we must return it to the sea … Those who make these rules should realise that when a fish is hauled onboard or to the surface, the vast majority of the times they are bloated … In other words, returning them to the ocean does not and will not save them from the inevitable (i.e. death).So, please tell me (and others) why in the world should a person be compelled to return that catch to the ocean? Why not allow a person to eat the fish as opposed to what's stated they must presently do with their catch?RAYMOND RAYSt. George'sAn unwelcome sightJanuary 16, 2011Dear Sir,Today the roads were closed in Hamilton for the Marathon. It was good to see people out on a Sunday in the City.It was only marred by the sight of an almost dead looking body sprawled on the sidewalk in front of the new HSBC building.I found out that he was in fact alive and all systems working as he urinated on the sidewalk in front of The English Sports Shop.As a Bermudian, I have unfortunately become accustomed and almost immune to the Hamilton “characters”. As a tourist being charged big “bucks” to travel and stay here, I would have been appalled.When did we stop being a tourist destination?Does anybody see or really care where we are headed?HEIDI COWENSouthamptonGrowing violenceJanuary 17, 2011Dear Sir,You'll see here in today's excerpt violence is a recurring problem in America, (and here in Bermuda as well). Five years after their initial injury, 20 percent of those who have had a gunshot or stab wound will be dead:“According to statistics from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), young black men have a higher rate of both fatal and nonfatal violence than any other group.“National statistics show that homicide is the leading cause of death for African American men between the ages of 15 and 34. In 2006, 2,946 black males between the ages of 15 and 24 were victims of homicide. This means that the homicide rate for black males aged 15 to 24 was 92 in 100,000. For white males in the same age range, the homicide rate was 4.7 in 100,000. In other words, the homicide death rate was more than 19 times higher for young black men than young white men.“Homicide numbers across the nation have decreased over the past decade, but a closer look at these homicide statistics shows disturbing trends. Daniel Webster and his colleagues at the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health have found that although overall homicide rates have appeared stable since 1999, the homicide rate among African American men between the ages of 25 and 44 has increased substantially. It is no wonder, then, that as these homicides are reported in the news, flashed across television screens, and recapitulated in films, we would come to associate young black men with homicide.“But homicide represents only the tip of the iceberg with regard to violence. Nonfatal injuries are far more common than fatal injuries. The CDC estimates that for every homicide, there are more than 94 nonfatal violent incidents. Even with the increasing lethality of the guns available, the ratio of firearm-related injuries from nonfatal physical assaults to firearm-related homicides was four to one. In other words, for every person who gets shot and dies, another four get shot and survive.“While it is true that a person is more likely to die of a gunshot wound than from injuries delivered by other kinds of weapons, many young people are stabbed or assaulted. The ratios of nonfatal to fatal injuries for other types of violence show the same pattern. For those who are stabbed or cut, 64 people survive for each person who dies.“For physical assaults, 3,243 people survive for each person who dies. In nonfatal injury, just as in homicide, black males are disproportionately affected. In data from the year 2000, the overall violent assault rate for black males was 4.6 times higher than the rate for non-Hispanic white males. Countless others suffer trauma or near-trauma that never comes to the attention of the health care system, like being shot at or being grazed by a bullet or beaten up but not badly enough to seek medical care.“Studies also show that violence is a recurrent problem. Up to 45 percent of people who have had a penetrating injury a gunshot or stab wound will have another similar injury within five years. More disturbing is the finding that five years after their initial injury, 20 percent of these individuals are dead.”RAYMOND RAY