Court: children should have lawyers – The Royal Gazette | Bermuda News, Business, Sports, Events, & Community

Log In

Reset Password

Court: children should have lawyers

Magistrates must consider appointing legal representatives to protect the rights of children who appear in court — but only if the money is available.

Puisne Judge Stephen Hellman ruled that the Children's Act required the Family Court to consider the appointment of a counsel or “litigation guardian” for children.

However, he said the legislation stopped short of making the Government pay for the service.

Mr Justice Hellman said: “This leaves a deeply unsatisfactory situation where, pursuant to its statutory duty, the Family Court will make orders for the appointment of litigation guardians and counsel which will in many cases not be complied with for want of public funding.

“For the present at least, the legislative intent in enacting the section will continue to be frustrated and children's constitutional right to meaningful participation in decisions which may be of vital importance to their lives and wellbeing will often remain unrealised.”

The judgment came after a legal action launched by several charities and community groups, including the Human Rights Commission, child protection group Childwatch and Citizens Uprooting Racism in Bermuda.

The Coalition for the Protection of Children, Family Centre, anti-child abuse charity Scars and the Women's Resource Centre were also involved in the court action.

The groups asked for a declaration that the Children's Act required the courts and the Government to provide representation for children in the majority of cases.

In his judgment, Mr Justice Hellman wrote that — in line with the legislation — the courts should appoint a litigation guardian or counsel for the child unless it is satisfied it is not needed to protect the child's interests.

He also said the court should give reasons for its decisions.

However, he added: “An order appointing a litigation guardian or counsel to represent the child concerned is made subject to funds being available to fund such appointment.”

Mr Justice Hellman said it would be “wrong in principle” for the courts to use their power to authorise the use of government money when the legislation did not allow for that.

He added: “I agree that fair hearing principles have evolved to the point where the child has a constitutional right to participate meaningfully in specified proceedings.

“However, where, pursuant to the right to a fair hearing, the Constitution confers a right to representation it does not also confer a right to have that representation publicly funded.”

Puisne Judge: Stephen Hellman (Photo by Glenn Tucker)

You must be registered or signed-in to post comment or to vote.

Published July 02, 2018 at 9:00 am (Updated July 02, 2018 at 3:50 am)

Court: children should have lawyers

What you
Need to
1. For a smooth experience with our commenting system we recommend that you use Internet Explorer 10 or higher, Firefox or Chrome Browsers. Additionally please clear both your browser's cache and cookies - How do I clear my cache and cookies?
2. Please respect the use of this community forum and its users.
3. Any poster that insults, threatens or verbally abuses another member, uses defamatory language, or deliberately disrupts discussions will be banned.
4. Users who violate the Terms of Service or any commenting rules will be banned.
5. Please stay on topic. "Trolling" to incite emotional responses and disrupt conversations will be deleted.
6. To understand further what is and isn't allowed and the actions we may take, please read our Terms of Service
7. To report breaches of the Terms of Service use the flag icon