Log In

Reset Password

A Korean Spring after the Winter Games? Unlikely

Peace between the Republic of Korea (South Korea) and the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (North Korea) suddenly seems closer than ever as the 2018 Winter Olympics open in Pyeongchang.

The North is contributing athletes to a binational team with the South, and also sending a delegation that includes its head of state, Kim Yong Nam, and the first official visitor to the South from its ruling dynasty — Kim Yo Jong, sister of Kim Jong Un.

The two Koreas have been in “ceasefire”, but still formally at war, with occasional outbreaks of violence, since 1953. Could this Olympic thaw result in permanently improved relations, a peace treaty, perhaps even reunification?

Don't get your hopes up. Many powerful forces are predisposed against such an outcome. All of those forces can be summed up in one word: inertia. After seven decades, any status quo is difficult to shatter.

In the North, continued rule by the Kim family and its Workers' Party depends largely on positioning the regime as guardians against an external threat posed by the South and by the US military presence along the ceasefire line.

Reunification under any circumstance, peaceful or otherwise, would result in the end of that regime, because the South's population is twice that of the North, its GDP 50 times as large. They are not going to peacefully submit to rule by the North's government. Even if the North could militarily conquer the South's territory, it would be assimilated by, not assimilate, that larger and wealthier population.

The South's government, on the other hand, has seen what happens when a larger, wealthier state welcomes back a still comparatively large, but much poorer, population. Reunified Germany — West Germany's population as of reunification in 1990 was 78 million, East Germany's 16 million — is still dealing with the economic, cultural and political fallout nearly two decades later.

And like the North's, the South's government has a vested interest in maintaining the status quo because tens of thousands of US troops, and lots and lots of money, subsidise the South's defence costs and artificially boost its economy.

The US Government, in turn, is happy with that situation because it is part of its raison d'être since the Second World War, which is to perpetually funnel wealth from the pockets of American workers into the bank accounts and budgets of the military industrial complex in the name of “defence”.

As for the Chinese Government, it regards North Korea as a “buffer zone”, keeping those US troops far away from its border — the last time US forces neared the Yalu River, China intervened and drove them back to the 38th Parallel, resulting in the present stalemate.

Some of those players are going to have to make bigger moves to break the ice.

A good start would be for the US to notify South Korea's Moon Jae In of a date — say, five years from now — for complete US military withdrawal from the Korean Peninsula. But that would threaten the bloated US “defence” budget. So don't bet on it.

Thomas L. Knapp is director and senior news analyst at the William Lloyd Garrison Centre for Libertarian Advocacy Journalism (thegarrisoncenter.org)

Aileen Christina Frisch of Korea starts her third run during the women's luge final at the 2018 Winter Olympics in Pyeongchang, South Korea (Photograph by Michael Sohn/AP)

You must be Registered or to post comment or to vote.

Published February 13, 2018 at 8:00 am (Updated February 13, 2018 at 8:02 am)

A Korean Spring after the Winter Games? Unlikely

What you
Need to
1. For a smooth experience with our commenting system we recommend that you use Internet Explorer 10 or higher, Firefox or Chrome Browsers. Additionally please clear both your browser's cache and cookies - How do I clear my cache and cookies?
2. Please respect the use of this community forum and its users.
3. Any poster that insults, threatens or verbally abuses another member, uses defamatory language, or deliberately disrupts discussions will be banned.
4. Users who violate the Terms of Service or any commenting rules will be banned.
5. Please stay on topic. "Trolling" to incite emotional responses and disrupt conversations will be deleted.
6. To understand further what is and isn't allowed and the actions we may take, please read our Terms of Service
7. To report breaches of the Terms of Service use the flag icon