Log In

Reset Password

Liberated from orthodoxy

Politicians, especially United States senators, don’t tend to give up power easily. Imagine Lyndon Johnson voluntarily leaving the Senate leadership especially at a moment when his party seemed poised to win the majority.

So it was a surprising moment when Tennessee Republican Lamar Alexander went to the Senate floor to announce that he would not seek another leadership post when his term as GOP conference chair expires next January. In the most striking phrase, Alexander said the move “will liberate me to spend more time trying to work for results on issues that I care the most about.”

A former governor, education secretary and two-time candidate for his party’s presidential nomination, Alexander described himself as a “very Republican Republican.”

That may be, but to understand Alexander’s sometimes uncomfortable fit into the role of chief message strategist for Senate Republicans, consider:

When the Senate was on the brink of breakdown over threats to filibuster judicial nominees, Alexander helped forge the Gang of 14 agreement to avert the so-called nuclear option. He was one of nine Republicans voting to confirm Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor.

Although opposition to the individual mandate has become a litmus test Republican issue, Alexander signed on to a far-reaching health reform plan crafted by Oregon Democrat Ron Wyden and then-Utah Sen. Robert Bennett that required individuals to obtain insurance.

Despite his party’s no-new-taxes orthodoxy, Alexander signed on to the bipartisan Gang of Six debt-reduction plan that called for a mix of spending cuts and

pause here for horrified gasp new tax revenue.

As Alexander told me when I went to see him the day after the announcement, the formula that the Gang of Six “used was basically to reform the tax code, lower the rates and to use some of the savings to reduce the debt. I thought that made common sense as a general principle. In the Simpson-Bowles case it was like 20 percent of the revenues that were created by lowering the rates went to reduce the debt. I think I could persuade 99 out of 100 people walking down the street in Maryville, Tenn., that that made common sense.”

In Maryville, perhaps, but not in the current Republican caucus.

At a time when crafting bipartisan legislation is viewed by some as consorting with the enemy, Alexander is working on clean air legislation with Delaware Democrat Tom Carper, and on nuclear waste disposal with Democrats Dianne Feinstein of California and Jeff Bingaman of New Mexico.

“If I could get a 100 percent Republican solution, I’d do it,” Alexander told me. “But you can’t do that in the Senate. It requires 60 votes. So some of us have to be willing to try to get results that include coalitions.”

The cynical interpretation of Alexander’s move is that he saw the handwriting on the wall and knew he would lose a bid to move up in the party hierarchy.

The No. 2 position, whip, is opening up with the retirement of Arizona Sen. Jon Kyl. In going for that slot, Alexander would have been competing against John Cornyn, who dispenses campaign checks and thereby collects some chits as head of the Senate GOP’s campaign arm.

But Alexander’s decision also underscores the frustration endemic among his colleagues about too many meaningless quorum calls and too little serious legislating.

“Most senators are here to offer amendments, vote, advocate and get a result,” Alexander said. “The idea that we go through a whole week on this useless discussion about disaster aid this week with limited opportunities for amendments that is genuinely frustrating to most members of the Senate.”

Listening to Alexander talk about the issues he’d like to work on unglamorous but important efforts such as increasing funding for national laboratories or finding a safe way to dispose of nuclear waste offers a jarring contrast to the shrunken federal role envisioned by some in his party.

His vision of getting entitlement spending under control is to open fiscal space for investments in higher education or infrastructure improvement. He would junk existing energy subsidies but use the money to increase investments in research and development for clean energy.

I left thinking that the Senate with a liberated Alexander could be a better place indeed.

Ruth Marcus’ e-mail address is ruthmarcus(at symbol)washpost.com.

(c) 2011, Washington Post Writers Group

You must be Registered or to post comment or to vote.

Published September 26, 2011 at 2:00 am (Updated September 26, 2011 at 10:05 am)

Liberated from orthodoxy

What you
Need to
1. For a smooth experience with our commenting system we recommend that you use Internet Explorer 10 or higher, Firefox or Chrome Browsers. Additionally please clear both your browser's cache and cookies - How do I clear my cache and cookies?
2. Please respect the use of this community forum and its users.
3. Any poster that insults, threatens or verbally abuses another member, uses defamatory language, or deliberately disrupts discussions will be banned.
4. Users who violate the Terms of Service or any commenting rules will be banned.
5. Please stay on topic. "Trolling" to incite emotional responses and disrupt conversations will be deleted.
6. To understand further what is and isn't allowed and the actions we may take, please read our Terms of Service
7. To report breaches of the Terms of Service use the flag icon