Log In

Reset Password
BERMUDA | RSS PODCAST

Heather Brooke, the woman who exposed the UK expenses scandal to speak tonight

UK freedom of information campaigner Heather Brooke is on the Island to speak at a forum this evening on your right to know. (Photo by Glenn Tucker)

Bermuda’s citizens will have the right to know by the end of this year and if anyone is able to help them understand why that matters, it is surely Heather Brooke.The UK-based activist and journalist has spent the last seven years requesting information from official bodies in that country, with dramatic results.The MPs’ expenses scandal which rocked Britain in 2009 and exposed how politicians were wasting public money on personal claims came about because of an FOI request Ms Brooke made to Parliament, which was refused.Her subsequent campaign for disclosure led to the total reform of the parliamentary expense system and her story was dramatised by the BBC in the film ‘On Expenses’.This evening, she will speak at a Centre for Justice forum on freedom of information, outlining why it is so important for ordinary people to be able to access official records.“You shouldn’t have to have money or be well connected or know the right people or be powerful to get basic civic information to find out how public services spend public money,” Ms Brooke told The Royal Gazette yesterday.“You shouldn’t have to take anybody out to lunch for it. If you don’t give people a statutory right to information, you end up with a patronage system where information becomes a commodity and people only get it if they are rich enough, powerful enough or if they are doing somebody a favour.“The point about public information is that it should be available to all, not just to a select few.”Mr Brooke was born in the US and worked as a reporter in the 1990s at the Spartanburg Herald-Journal, in South Carolina, and the Spokesman-Review, in Spokane, Washington.She gave up journalism and moved to the UK at the end of that decade to do a master’s degree, but was “propelled into the FOI scene” after seeking basic information about her neighbourhood.“I had all these problems where I lived: rubbish collections, feral youths, low-level crime.“Police didn’t do anything, the council didn’t do anything. I was trying to figure out who was in charge here, why isn’t anything getting done.“Because I’d been a reporter in America I knew all the documentation that existed. I couldn’t figure out why they wouldn’t give it out [in Britain]. They were saying ‘nobody in Britain gets to know’.”At the time, the UK’s Freedom of Information Act was about to come into force. Ms Brooke, by then working as a freelance writer, pitched an idea for a book called ‘Your Right to Know’ to a publisher.‘I felt I was in a pretty privileged position,” she said. “I had seen how the law worked in America.“I remember thinking: how does any journalist do their job in the UK? I thought they were way too accepting. They didn’t know any different. I did.”Her book, a how-to-guide for anyone wanting to make an FOI request, turned Ms Brooke into one of the country’s leading experts on the topic and motivated her to make countless requests herself.“I thought: ‘I need to do it to show how it works’,” she said. “I was used to getting information so when I didn’t get it, I was surprised and outraged and offended.“I never set out thinking ‘oh, parliament is corrupt’ or ‘MPs are wasting a bunch of money’. That was just one of hundreds of FOI requests I made. They basically drew attention to themselves because of their extreme obstruction.”Ms Brooke’s campaign to get details of the expenses ended up in the High Court, as a test case which she won in 2008. But parliament still resisted the release of the information.Eventually, a disc containing all the information was leaked to the Daily Telegraph and the full scale of the misuse of taxpayer cash was exposed.“I felt vindicated on a number of fronts,” said Ms Brooke. “Everyone was so arrogantly sure that Britain was this model democracy and that’s not possible.“Humans are fallible. If you give people a lot of money that’s not their money, and say ‘do what you like with it’, it’s just like a blank cheque.”Premier Paula Cox has promised Bermuda’s long-awaited public access to information law will become operational “in the second half of 2012”.Ms Brooke said ordinary citizens should ensure they take full advantage of it when it comes into force.“I’m sure that people in Bermuda think the country can be better run than it is,” she said. “I’m sure that everybody has an issue about inequality or justice.“The only way to fight any of these problems and to make sure society is working for the benefit of the majority of people, rather than a select few, is to argue on a level playing field.“If they have all the information and you have none, you are completely impotent.”Tonight’s forum is at the Church Hall at St Paul AME Church in Hamilton between 6pm and 8pm. Light refreshments will be served at 5.30pmwww.yrtk.org

An open forum on transparency and good governance taking place this evening will hear how public officials are held to account on another small British island.

Nicola Williams, the Complaints Commissioner of the Cayman Islands, will be one of the guest speakers at the Centre for Justice session at St Paul AME Church Hall in Hamilton at 6pm.

Ms Williams, the equivalent of Bermuda’s Ombudsman, will talk about the principles of good administration and good governance, as well as her own experiences dealing with some 350 to 400 complaints a year on the Caribbean island.

“We can investigate, in Cayman, up to and including the Premier and the Leader of the Opposition,” Ms Williams told

The Royal Gazette. That’s in contrast to here, where the Ombudsman is limited to civil servants.Ms Williams said she’d conducted several “own motion” inquiries where there was an issue she considered to be of “wider public importance,” including one on pensions and another on health and safety in the construction industry.Bermuda’s Ombudsman, Arlene Brock, came in for criticism from Government earlier this year after she published a report on special development orders following an own motion inquiry.Environment Minister Marc Bean suggested she may not have been entitled to launch her inquiry and questioned whether her conclusions were “without bias”.Ms Brock insisted she was entirely within her rights to carry out the investigation.Ms Williams, who also sits part-time as a judge in England, said she hadn’t had to deal with personal criticism in as “blatant a way” though her pensions report did ruffle feathers.“I know there were key people in government connected with that issue that were incandescent with rage that I would have had the nerve to investigate that,” she said.“But I’m completely unconcerned about being popular professionally. If that’s what you want, then that’s not the job for you.”Other speakers at tonight’s forum include UK-based FOI expert Heather Brooke (see separate story) and lawyers Kevin Comeau, Saul Froomkin, Peter Martin and Larry Mussenden.Venous Memari, the Centre of Justice’s managing director, said: “The purpose of the forum is to provide an analytical overview of existing legislation in relation to freedom of information, good governance and good administration.“I think it’s important that people recognise that in a true democracy they hold the power and that means that they participate in government’s decisions by demanding transparency and holding public officials accountable.“We have a talk show culture, which is great, because people call in and freely express their views and opinions. But without more, ‘talk show’ dialogue doesn’t translate into effective policy change and law reform.“Hopefully, after the forum, people will have a greater understanding of our legislation and institutions so they can participate in the government decision-making process in an informed way.”www.occ.gov.ky.